My spiritual exercises
utorak, 18.07.2017.
What is Shunning?
Many of you, especially those who came to my hometown to pay me a visit, wonder how can someone as val3 be at same time popular, interesting and charming blogger, and yet – nobody in his home town has ever heard of him. If you ask someone in the street, for instance, where I live (if you want to give him a present, or just see him and chat for a while), that’s exactly what they’d tell you. Why is it so? Answer is here. Read it carefully.
Shunning is the act of deliberately avoiding association with, and habitually keeping away from an individual or group. It is a sanction against association often associated with religious groups and other tightly-knit organisations and communities. Targets of shunning can include, but are not limited to apostates, whistleblowers, dissidents, persons classified as: "sinner" or "traitors" and other people who defy or who fail to comply with the standards established by the shunning group(s). [In my case they are local freemasons] Shunning has a long history as a means of organisational influence and control. Extreme forms of shunning and related practices have rendered the general practice controversial in some circles.
Purposes
Shunning can be broken down into behaviours and practices that seek to accomplish either or both of two primary goals.
1.To modify the behaviour of a member. This approach seeks to influence, encourage, or coerce normative behaviours from members. It may, conversely, seek to dissuade, provide disincentives for, or to compel avoidance of certain behaviours. In this context shunning may include disassociation from the member by other members of the community who are in good standing. It may also include more antagonistic psychological behaviours (described below). This approach may be seen as either corrective or punitive (or both) by the group membership or leadership, and may also be intended as a deterrent.
2.To remove or limit the influence of a member (or former member) over other members in a community. This approach may seek to isolate, to discredit, or otherwise dis-empower such a member, often in the context of actions or positions advocated by that member. For groups with clearly defined membership criteria, especially criteria based on key behaviours or ideological precepts, this approach may be seen as limiting damage to the community or its leadership. This is often paired with some form of excommunication.
Some less often practiced variants may seek to:
Remove a specific member from general external influence, so as to provide an ideological or psychological buffer against external views or behaviour. The extent can vary from severing ties to opponents of the group up to and including severing all non-group-affiliated intercourse.
Shunning is usually approved of (if sometimes with regret) by the group engaging in the shunning, and usually highly disapproved-of by the target of the shunning. This certainly results in a polarization of views. Those subject to the practice respond differently, usually depending both on the circumstances of the event, and the nature of the practices being applied. However, more extreme forms of shunning have caused substantial damage to individuals' psychological and relational health. As such, extreme responses to the practice have evolved, primarily around anti-shunning advocacy. Such advocates highlight the detrimental effects of many of the mentioned behaviours, and seek to limit their practice either through pressure or law. Such groups will often also operate supportive organizations or institutions, to help those subjected to shunning to recover from some of the worst effects. These groups will also, sometimes, attack the organizations practicing shunning directly, as a part of their advocacy.
In many civil societies, variants of shunning are practiced either de-facto or de-jure, to coerce or avert behaviours or associations deemed unhealthy. This can include:
• restraining orders or peace bonds (to avoid abusive relationships)
• court injunctions to sever associations (to avoid criminal association or temptation)
• medical or psychological instruction to avoid association (to avoid hazardous relations, i.e. alcoholics being instructed to avoid friendship with non-recovering alcoholics, or asthmatics being medically instructed to keep to smoke-free environs)
These effects are seen as positive by society, though often not by the affected parties.
Effects
Shunning is often used as a pejorative term to describe any organizationally mandated disassociation, and has acquired a connotation of abuse and relational aggression. This is due to the sometimes extreme damage caused by its disruption to normal relationships between individuals, such as friendships and family relations. Disruption of established relationships certainly causes pain, which is at least an unintended consequence of the practices described here, though it may also in many cases be an intended, coercive consequence. This pain, especially when seen as unjustly inflicted, can have secondary general psychological effects on self-worth and self-confidence, trust and trustworthiness, and can, as with other types of trauma, impair psychological function.
Shunning often involves implicit or explicit shame for a member who commits acts seen as wrong by the group or its leadership. Such shame may not be psychologically damaging if the membership is voluntary and the rules of behaviour clear before the person joined. However, if the rules are arbitrary, the group membership seen as essential for personal security, safety, or health, or if the application of the rules are inconsistent, such shame can be highly destructive. This can be especially damaging if perceptions are attacked or controlled, or various tools of psychological pressure applied. Extremes of this cross over the line into psychological torture and can be permanently scarring.
A key detrimental effect of some of the practices associated with shunning relate to their effect on relationships, especially family relationships. At its extremes, the practices may destroy marriages, break up families, and separate children and their parents. The effect of shunning can be very dramatic or even devastating on the shunnee, as it can damage or destroy the shunned member's closest familial, spousal, social, emotional, and economic bonds.
Shunning contains aspects of what is known as relational aggression in psychological literature. When used by church members and member-spouse parents against excommunicant parents it contains elements of what psychologists call parental alienation. Extreme shunning may cause traumas to the shunned (and to their dependents) similar to what is studied in the psychology of torture.
Civil rights implications
Some aspects of shunning may also be seen as being at odds with civil rights or human rights, especially those behaviours that coerce and attack. When a group seeks to have an effect, through such practices, outside its own membership — for instance when a group seeks to cause financial harm through isolation and disassociation — they can come at odds with their surrounding civil society, if such society enshrines rights such as freedom of association, conscience, or belief. Many civil societies, however, do not extend such protections to the internal operations of communities or organizations, so long as an ex-member has the same rights, prerogatives, and power as any other member of the civil society.
Conversely, in cases where a group or religion is state-sanctioned (e. g. in communist states), a key power, or in the majority (Singapore), a shunned former member may face especially severe social, political, and/or financial costs. Some, including researchers of mind control, brainwashing and menticide groups, identify the practice with "cult-like" or totalitarian behaviour.
HOROSCOPES OF INCARNATIONS – DICKINSON FAMILY
EDWARD DICKINSON 01/01/1803 AMHERST,MS - Sun in Capricorn/Moon in Aries
EMILY NORCROSS DICKINSON 03/07/1804 MONSON, MS – Sun in Cancer/Moon in Taurus
WILLIAM DICKINSON 16/04/1829 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Aries/ Moon in Libra
EMILY DICKINSON 10/12/1830 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Libra
LAVINIA NORCROSS DICKINSON 28/02/1833 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Pisces/Moon in Gemini
EDWARD 'NED' DICKINSON 19/06/1861 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Gemini/Moon in Scorpio
MARTHA DICKINSON BIANCHI 30/11/1866 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Virgo
THOMAS GILBERT DICKINSON 01/08/1875 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Leo/Moon in Leo
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLINT EASTWOOD 31/05/1930 SAN FRANCISCO,CA – Sun in Gemini/Moon in Leo
DINA RUIZ EASTWOOD 11/07/1965 CASTRO VALLEY, CA – Sun in Cancer/Moon in Sagittarius
DESIDERIO VALACCO 09/05/1962 PULA, CRO – Sun in Taurus/Moon in Cancer
LESLIE CARON 01/07/1931 BOULOGNE-SUR-SEINE, FRA – Sun in Cancer/Moon in Aquarius
PAULA MARSHALL 12/06/1964 – Sun in Gemini/Moon in Cancer
GEORGE KENNEDY 18/02/1925 NEW YORK, NY – Sun in Aquarius/Moon in Sagittarius
ALI CAMPBELL 15/02/1959 BRIMINGHAM, UK – Sun in Aquarius/Moon in Taurus
SARAH HYLAND 24/11/1990 NEW YORK, NY – Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Aquarius
subota, 15.07.2017.
MARTHA DICKINSON – SARAH HYLAND ASTROLOGY & NUMEROLOGY
Recently I remembered again the actress Sarah Hyland and the picture that she somehow (with a help from hacker?) pasted along with my post of February 7th 2012. If you read the pic data, you can see that she was obviously obsessed with number 13. Photo was taken on June, 16, so 6+1+6=13. The year was '13. Time when it was taken: 5.17 p.m. (5+1+7=13). And finally, dimensions of the photo: 480X640 (3+10=13). Name 'Sarah' gives 3, and surname 'Hyland' gives 10, altogether... 13.
I've somehow came upon the idea that she might be incarnation of Martha Dickinson, daughter of Susan and William Dickinson. In other words, that she was niece of famous poet Emily Dickinson, in her 19th century incarnation.
I noticed also some numerological and astrological congruences. If we add up the numerals of her birth, we get number 36. Susan Dickinson (incarnation Mia Kovačić) was 36 years old when she gave birth to her daughter Martha. They were both Sagittarius, not only in that incarnation, but in this one, too! Moreover, Sarah has Moon in Aquarius, as her mother had in her previous incarnation.
'Susan Dickinson' also gives 13, as well as day and month of her birth (10+3=13). In the year '13, Sarah Hyland played character named 'Mia', (i.e. name of the present incarnation of her mother) in Scary Movie V.
MARTHA DICKINSON 30/11/1866 AMHERST, MS – Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Virgo
NAME: 8 + 4 = 12
BIRTH DATE: 3 + 2 = 5 + 3 = 8
SARAH HYLAND 24/11/1990 NEW YORK, NY – Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Aquarius
NAME: 3 + 10 = 13
BIRTH DATE: 6 + 2 = 8 + 10 = 18 = 9
-----------------------------------------------------------
SUSAN DICKINSON 19/12/1830 GENEVA, NY– Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Aquarius
NAME: 9 + 4 = 13
BIRTH DATE: 10 + 3 = 13 + 12 = 25 = 7
MIA KOVAČIĆ 15/12/1982 ZAGREB, CRO – Sun in Sagittarius/Moon in Sagittarius
NAME: 6 + 5 = 11
BIRTH DATE: 6 + 12 = 18 = 9 + 20 = 29 = 11
utorak, 11.07.2017.
POTOMSTVO FRANZA I I MARIJE TEREZIJE
Moja inkarnacija u XVIII stoljeću, kao što sam to također ranije objavio, bila je ona svetog rimskog cara Franza I (1708-1765). No, od 1728 pa do 1737 Franz je bio samo vojvoda od Lorraine, naslijedivši svog oca, vojvodu Leopolda. Car je postao ženidbom za caricu Mariju Tereziju [inkarnacija Fani Stipković], kćer svetog rimskog cara Karla VI [inkarnacija Helmut Berger].
Car i carica imali su ukupno 16-oro djece. Od toga, troje je umrlo u veoma ranom djetinjstvu, a još troje u tinejdžerskoj dobi. Od 10-oro djece koja su doživjela zrelu dob, sedam je stupilo u brak. Nadvojvotkinja Maria Anna [inkarnacija Liv Tyler] nije se udavala, bila je prilično krhka zdravlja. Godine 1766. postala je opaticom u Pragu, a zatim u Klagenfurtu, gdje je proiživjela ostatak života. Nadvojvotkinja Maria Christina [inkarnacija Amanda Seyfried] se udala za Alberta, vojvodu od Teschena. Bili su imenovani guvrnerima Austrijske Nizozemske, no, nakon 1792. živjeli su u Beču.
Nadvojvotkinja Maria Elisabeta [inkarnacija Kate Winslet] nije se udavala, i postala je opatica konventa u Insbrucku. Ona je jedina koja je bila također dijete naših prošlih inkarnacija, kao kneza Fridriha V i Elizabete Stewart. Ponovo je izabrala da živi u konventu.
Nadvojvoda Karl Josef [inkarnacija Arsen Dedić] umro je sa 16 godina od malih boginja. Bio je omiljeno dijete Marije Terezije, a bio je i ljubomoran na brata Josefa II, koji je postao carem, te je navdodno tvrdio, da bi on bio bolji kao car.
Nadvojvotkinja Maria Amalia [inkarnacija Nikolina Pišek] se udala za Ferdinanda, vojvodu od Parme [inkarnacija Kristijan Curavić]. Sa majkom nije imala dobar odnos. Isticala se ljepotom. Nakon udaje, nije bila sretna, jer je bila zaljubljena u princa Charlesa od Zweibrücken-a, sa kojim majka nije dozvolila brak. U Parmi se prilčno slobodno ponašala, tako da je ljutila majku Mariju Tereziju. Također se miješala u politiku, i često mijenjala muževljeve odluke, sve dok joj nije u potpunosti prepustio vođenje državnih poslova.
Maria Johanna [inkarnacija Scarlett Johansson] umrla je u dobi od 12 godina, od malih boginja. Kao dijete bila je simpatična i dobrodušna, najradije se družila sa sestrom Marijom Josefom. Bila je vrlo obrazovana na području umjetnosti, u muzici i plesu, te crtanju i slikanju.
Maria Josefa [inkarnacija Sarah Jessica Parker], također je umrla od malih boginja, u dobi od 16 godina. Plašila se smrti od malih boginja nakon što joj je starija sestra umrla, pet godina ranije, kao da je slutila da će je zadesiti ista sudbina. (Nešto ranije, 1765., umro je i otac, car Franz I.)
Nadvojvotkinja Maria Carolina [inkarnacija Rachel Roberts] udala se za Ferdinanda IV, kralja Napulja i Sicilije [inkarnacija Rex Harrison], te s njime imala brojno potomstvo. Jedna od kćeri bila je Maria Teresa [inkarnacija Kaley Cuoco], koja će se udati za sina Leopolda II (tj. car Franz II, inkarnacija Buster Keaton) i postati zadnja sveta rimska carica.
Nadvojvoda Ferdinand [inkarnacija Miroslav Škoro] oženio je Mariju d'Este, vojvotkinju od Masse [inkarnacija Kim Škoro],te s njome imao potomstvo. Postao je vojvodom od Breisgau-a 1803. godine. Bio je također utemeljitelj dinastije Austrija-Este, te guverner Milanskog vojvodstva. Živio je sa ženom u Milanu, sve do Napoleonove invazije, a poslije u Breisgau (jugozapadna Njemačka).
Nadvojvoda Franz [inkarnacija Krešimir Mišak] postao je nadbiskup-elektor Kelna 1784. godine. Bio je također veliki meštar Teutonskog reda. Ono, što je posebno zanimljivo, bio je poslodavac i patron mladog Ludwiga van Beethovena.
Međutim, nekako najvažnije od naše djece bila su dvojica budućih careva: Josef II [inkarnacija Martin Landau] i Leopold II [inkarnacija George S. Patton], te nadvojvotkinja Maria Antonia [inkarnacija Barbara Eden], koja je postala francuska kraljica, čuvena Marie Antoinette.
Najstariji sin Josef prvi je postao carem, nakon očeve smrti 1765. godine. Bio je zagovornik tzv. prosvijećenog apsolutizma. Zajedno sa ruskom caricom Katarinom Velikom i pruskim kraljem Fridrihom Velikim, činio je trio velikih monarha razdoblja prosvjetiteljstva. Kada je 1790. umro, nije ostavio muških nasljednika, tako da je vladar postao njegov brat Leopold II.
Leopold II bio je kratko vrijeme sveti rimski car, samo od 1790. do 1792. godine. Njegova prerana smrt (imao je samo 45 godina) obavijena je velom misterije, baš kao i smrt generala Pattona, njegove inkarnacije u 19/20. stoljeću. Citat iz Wikipedije: „He died suddenly in Vienna, in March 1792, although some claimed he was poisoned or secretly murdered.”
Kraljica Maria Antonia, ili francuski Marie Antoinette, bila je posljednja francuska kraljica prije revolucije. Bila je najmlađe žensko dijete cara i carice. Godine 1770. udala se za budućeg kralja Louisa XVI. U početku je bila popularna u narodu da bi kasnije pala u nemilost, prvenstveno spletkama ništarija poput 'grofa' Cagliostra. U junu 1791. nije uspio bijeg od krvožednih 'revolucionara', slijedeće godine kraljevski par je bio uhapšen, da bi u oktobru 1793. bila osuđena na smrt od 'revolucionarnog tribunala' sačinjenog od monstruoznih masovnih ubica i terorista poput Robespierrea, Dantona, Marata i drugih.
srijeda, 05.07.2017.
POTOMSTVO FRIDRIHA V
Kao što sam već ranije bio objavio, moja inkarnacija u XVII stoljeću bila je Fridrih V (1596-1632), izborni knez Rajnske oblasti (Rhineland-Pfalz). Bio je poznat po nadimku „Zimski kralj“, jer je vladao Bohemijom (kasnije Čehoslovačka) samo jednu zimu (1619-20). Njegova supruga bila je Elizabeta Stewart (inkarnacija Fani Stipković), kći engleskog kralja Jamesa I (inkarnacija Robert de Niro).
Par je imao 13-toro djece, od kojih je troje umrlo u ranom djetinjstvu. Pokušao sam doći do njihovih inkarnacija, te nekako uspio doći čak do 10 njih. Neki su Nijemci (glumac Jan Josef Liefers, snimatelj Robert Brinkmann, te Barbara Orbison, supruga poznatijeg Roy-a), neki britanski i američki glumci (Matt Dillon, James Stewart, Kate Winslet, Montgomery Clift i Angelina Jolie), a tu se našao, začudo i jedan Hrvat, Hrvoje Novosel, koji nije neki veliki celebrity, ali je zato vodeći domaći stručnjak u biodinamičkoj poljoprivredi, koju je, interesantno, utemeljio Rudolf Steiner, Nijemac rođen u Hrvatskoj.
Nekako je najvažnije od djece ipak njemačka glumica Romy Schneider. Ona je bila inkarnacija Sophie od Hanover-a; udala se za Ernesta Augusta, kneza-elektora Hanovera (inkarnacija Alain Delon), te je njihov potomak bio – nitko drugi do čuveni režiser Alfred Hitchcock, utjelovljen kao kralj George I, prvi kralj Velike Britanije iz dinastije Hanover.
FREDERICK V ISSUE
As I already published before, my incarnation in 17th century was Frederick V (1596-1632), Elector of Rhine Palatinate. He was nicknamed „Winter King“, because he ruled over Bohemia (later Chechoslovakia) for just one winter (1619-20). His spouse was Elizabeth Stewart (inkarnation Fani Stipković), daughter of English king James I (incarnation Robert de Niro).
The couple had 13 children, from whom three died in early infancy. I tried somehow to get to know their incarnations, and somehow succeeded in finding ten of them. Some are Germans (actor Jan Josef Liefers, camera-man Robert Brinkmann and Barbara Orbison, wife of better known Roy), some British and American actors (Matt Dillon, James Stewart, Kate Winslet, Montgomery Clift i Angelina Jolie), here is, surprisingly, one Croat, Hrvoje Novosel – not some big celebrity, but, leading domestic expert in biodinamic agriculture, which was, - interesting – established by Rudolf Steiner, German born in Croatia.
Somehow, the most important child was, however, German actress Romy Schneider. She was incarnation of Sophie of Hanover; she married Ernest Augustus, Elector of Hanover (incarnation Alain Delon) and their decendant was nobody else but - famous movie director Alfred Hitchcock, incarnated as king George I, the first king of Great Britain from Hanover dynasty.
