Inteligentnima ovo be treba, jer znyju. A onima koiima treba - ne znaku prevesti....:)))) Znas onu Djolrtovu: ," Slabo divanim madzarski....nesto malo, a i to s greskom....pa kaze: "nisam migo da zamislim da ce mi tolko trebati...":)))) Ljub!
26.12.2023. (13:50)
-
-
-
- - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
treba, treba jezike znati, kad sam bila na Ibizi, svaki trafikant je govorio pet jezika, i prodavači u suvenirnicama, nisam mogla vjerovati s kojom lakoćom su se ti trgovci u Kataloniji sporazumijevali s kupcima na njihovim jezicima, ovdje se ministar hvali da ne zna svjetsko pismo i da šta će mu a vodio je gospodarstvo, da pukneš od smijeha, mi smo znali svi u osnovnoj školi dva pisma, u petom osnovne, danas se ministri hvale da ne znaju, ljub!
26.12.2023. (22:32)
-
-
-
- - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
"There’s just one problem with this theory: there’s no evidence for it. Gardner just came up with the concept and added the additional intelligences seemingly on a whim. At no point did he gather any data, or design any tests, to support his idea. The notion of ‘multiple intelligences’ has become very popular among educators, as a kind of wishful thinking: if a child has poor (say) logical-mathematical abilities, the argument goes, they might still be good at another kind of intelligence! But denying the huge amount of evidence for general intelligence does nobody any favours. Many of Gardner’s ‘intelligences’ can be conceptualized as skills, or even personality traits, but to describe them as ‘intelligences’ makes a mockery of the definition of the word. (See Waterhouse, 2006, for a detailed critique of multiple intelligences.)"
:(
CHECK THE FACTS: Reframing the Mind By Daniel T. Willingham
Please read the whole thing: http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/ednext20043_18 .pdf
A review of: The Origins and Development of High Ability / CIBA FOUNDATION SYMPOSIUM 178 (Chairman: R.C.Atkinson) / (Editors: G.R.Bock (Organizer) & Kate Ackrill) / Chichester, UK : Wiley DePublisher. pp.viii + 258. ISBN 0 471 93945 5.
"Despite his fifteen years of high-profile taxpayer-funded research on abilities, Gardner amazingly presents mere biographical sketches of seven turn-of-the-century geniuses (including Martha Graham) who happen to suit him."
Chris Brand:
"Personally, I just could not believe that anyone would take Howard Gardner's (1983) Frames of Mind seriously. It was a nicely written and pleasantly biographical book, but it contained hardly a single relevant correlation -- and none of the zero correlations between reliable mental tests that Gardner needed to establish his dis-unitarian thesis of 'multiple intelligences.' Surely Gardner would be a laughing stock once people read the review by Sandra Scarr in New Ideas in Psychology.[8] Of course, I was living in cloud-cuckoo land."
[8] Here is an extract from Sandra Scarr's spirited critique of Gardner's book.
"The implicit theme of this book [H.Gardner's Frames of Mind] is that some socially significant talents are not sufficiently recognized and rewarded; ergo, call them intelligence, and everyone will salute the flag. One senses the Red Queen speaking in Alice in Wonderland when one reads Gardner's proposal to call movement, musical talent, and interpersonal skills 'intelligence'....[Gardner's] list of intelligences is also less than I want, if I am to play his game. Gardner forgot some evolutionarily important kinds of knowledge or intelligence, if you wish, many of which pertain particularly to women.... When to pinch a snapdragon, fertilize tomatoes, replant lettuce; when to discipline a child, permit what kinds of independence, encourage achievement, or nurture personality; what season to snare geese, shoot ducks, breed chickens; which goats to select for breeding? ....How about attracting mates with [variously] gracefulness, cool dress, carriage, swagger, coquettishness?...
For liberals, the elitism implied by intellectual assessment, which results in some pigs being appraised more highly than others, evokes guilt about their own lofty achievements. Perhaps, if the standards of achievement by which they have been judged were not so narrow, so ethnocentric, then others would deserve similar recognition. Such liberals of distinction are inclined to throw sops to the other pigs. Gardner seems susceptible to this form of intellectual noblesse oblige."
-----
Brand, C. (1996). The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications. Chichester, England: Wiley
Even Howard Gardner, the foremost champion of multiple independent abilities over the past fifteen y
26.12.2023. (22:36)
-
-
-
- - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
years, has been unable to deliver any package of demonstrably uncorrelated mental tests (e.g. Gardner, 1993a,c; Krechevsky & Gardner, 1994)
Gardner's failure has even led him to deny that his theory of 'multiple intelligences' constitutes any definite "set of hypotheses and predictions." Apparently he thinks this exempts him from testing his theory before urging on educational practitioners - even though he would seem to be plainly committed to the eminently testable proposition that there are several major variations in mental abilities that are independent of g . He tries to explain (Gardner, 1994): "multiple intelligences....is an organized framework for configuring an ensemble of data about human cognition in different cultures. I bristle at the notion that educational work in the vein should grind to a halt while some kind of decisive scientific test is carried out." Again, Krechevsky & Gardner (1994,) frankly opt out of the too daunting task of trying to break up g into the promised 'multiple intelligences'. They write (p.302): "Overall, we intend our theory to be an expanding and unifying conception, rather than one which directly confronts or refutes psychological trait and factor analytic approaches." It may prove easier for Gardner to 'disprove' the unity of intelligence by the course which he has sometimes favoured of defining it as encompassing artistic and even athletic ability (Gardner, 1983) - and perhaps throwing in capacities for alcohol consumption and sexual vigour for good measure."
26.12.2023. (22:39)
-
-
-
- - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
ne znam puno o tim teorijama, da sam nešto intelignatan vjerojatno bih plivao u ovom svijetu kao riba u vodi, ili je to što se u njega nekako nikada do kraja ne možeš uklopiti znak nečeg vrijednog... ne znam, ali želim od srca svako dobro u Novoj :)
01.01.2024. (18:48)
-
-
-
- - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
Dečki, sretna vam Nova od srca, SVE NAJBOLJE! Baš mi je drago da ste se javili, moja mama je uvijek govorila da kad muško prvo čestita Novu je sreća, a žensko - nesreća :)))))))))))))))))))))) Hvala!
01.01.2024. (23:00)
-
-
-
- - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
starry night
najnovije na BRAINY DOSE
26.12.2023. (10:35) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
luki2
Inteligentnima ovo be treba, jer znyju. A onima koiima treba - ne znaku prevesti....:)))) Znas onu Djolrtovu: ," Slabo divanim madzarski....nesto malo, a i to s greskom....pa kaze: "nisam migo da zamislim da ce mi tolko trebati...":)))) Ljub!
26.12.2023. (13:50) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
Galaksija
Gardnerova teorija mi se sviđa. :))
26.12.2023. (20:08) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
starry night
treba, treba jezike znati, kad sam bila na Ibizi, svaki trafikant je govorio pet jezika, i prodavači u suvenirnicama, nisam mogla vjerovati s kojom lakoćom su se ti trgovci u Kataloniji sporazumijevali s kupcima na njihovim jezicima, ovdje se ministar hvali da ne zna svjetsko pismo i da šta će mu a vodio je gospodarstvo, da pukneš od smijeha, mi smo znali svi u osnovnoj školi dva pisma, u petom osnovne, danas se ministri hvale da ne znaju, ljub!
26.12.2023. (22:32) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
starry night
@Galaksija
"There’s just one problem with this theory: there’s no evidence for it. Gardner just came up with the concept and added the additional intelligences seemingly on a whim. At no point did he gather any data, or design any tests, to support his idea. The notion of ‘multiple intelligences’ has become very popular among educators, as a kind of wishful thinking: if a child has poor (say) logical-mathematical abilities, the argument goes, they might still be good at another kind of intelligence! But denying the huge amount of evidence for general intelligence does nobody any favours. Many of Gardner’s ‘intelligences’ can be conceptualized as skills, or even personality traits, but to describe them as ‘intelligences’ makes a mockery of the definition of the word. (See Waterhouse, 2006, for a detailed critique of multiple intelligences.)"
:(
CHECK THE FACTS: Reframing the Mind By Daniel T. Willingham
Please read the whole thing:
http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/ednext20043_18 .pdf
A review of: The Origins and Development of High Ability / CIBA FOUNDATION SYMPOSIUM 178 (Chairman: R.C.Atkinson) / (Editors: G.R.Bock (Organizer) & Kate Ackrill) / Chichester, UK : Wiley DePublisher. pp.viii + 258. ISBN 0 471 93945 5.
"Despite his fifteen years of high-profile taxpayer-funded research on abilities, Gardner amazingly presents mere biographical sketches of seven turn-of-the-century geniuses (including Martha Graham) who happen to suit him."
Chris Brand:
"Personally, I just could not believe that anyone would take Howard Gardner's (1983) Frames of Mind seriously. It was a nicely written and pleasantly biographical book, but it contained hardly a single relevant correlation -- and none of the zero correlations between reliable mental tests that Gardner needed to establish his dis-unitarian thesis of 'multiple intelligences.' Surely Gardner would be a laughing stock once people read the review by Sandra Scarr in New Ideas in Psychology.[8] Of course, I was living in cloud-cuckoo land."
[8] Here is an extract from Sandra Scarr's spirited critique of Gardner's book.
"The implicit theme of this book [H.Gardner's Frames of Mind] is that some socially significant talents are not sufficiently recognized and rewarded; ergo, call them intelligence, and everyone will salute the flag. One senses the Red Queen speaking in Alice in Wonderland when one reads Gardner's proposal to call movement, musical talent, and interpersonal skills 'intelligence'....[Gardner's] list of intelligences is also less than I want, if I am to play his game. Gardner forgot some evolutionarily important kinds of knowledge or intelligence, if you wish, many of which pertain particularly to women.... When to pinch a snapdragon, fertilize tomatoes, replant lettuce; when to discipline a child, permit what kinds of independence, encourage achievement, or nurture personality; what season to snare geese, shoot ducks, breed chickens; which goats to select for breeding? ....How about attracting mates with [variously] gracefulness, cool dress, carriage, swagger, coquettishness?...
For liberals, the elitism implied by intellectual assessment, which results in some pigs being appraised more highly than others, evokes guilt about their own lofty achievements. Perhaps, if the standards of achievement by which they have been judged were not so narrow, so ethnocentric, then others would deserve similar recognition. Such liberals of distinction are inclined to throw sops to the other pigs. Gardner seems susceptible to this form of intellectual noblesse oblige."
-----
Brand, C. (1996). The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications. Chichester, England: Wiley
Even Howard Gardner, the foremost champion of multiple independent abilities over the past fifteen y
26.12.2023. (22:36) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
starry night
years, has been unable to deliver any package of demonstrably uncorrelated mental tests (e.g. Gardner, 1993a,c; Krechevsky & Gardner, 1994)
Gardner's failure has even led him to deny that his theory of 'multiple intelligences' constitutes any definite "set of hypotheses and predictions." Apparently he thinks this exempts him from testing his theory before urging on educational practitioners - even though he would seem to be plainly committed to the eminently testable proposition that there are several major variations in mental abilities that are independent of g . He tries to explain (Gardner, 1994): "multiple intelligences....is an organized framework for configuring an ensemble of data about human cognition in different cultures. I bristle at the notion that educational work in the vein should grind to a halt while some kind of decisive scientific test is carried out." Again, Krechevsky & Gardner (1994,) frankly opt out of the too daunting task of trying to break up g into the promised 'multiple intelligences'. They write (p.302): "Overall, we intend our theory to be an expanding and unifying conception, rather than one which directly confronts or refutes psychological trait and factor analytic approaches." It may prove easier for Gardner to 'disprove' the unity of intelligence by the course which he has sometimes favoured of defining it as encompassing artistic and even athletic ability (Gardner, 1983) - and perhaps throwing in capacities for alcohol consumption and sexual vigour for good measure."
26.12.2023. (22:39) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
j.
ne znam puno o tim teorijama, da sam nešto intelignatan vjerojatno bih plivao u ovom svijetu kao riba u vodi, ili je to što se u njega nekako nikada do kraja ne možeš uklopiti znak nečeg vrijednog... ne znam, ali želim od srca svako dobro u Novoj :)
01.01.2024. (18:48) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
TEATRALNI
Nisam u stanju komentirat (opio se sinoć čitaj koncetracija u derastičnom padu) pa da ti samo čestitam sve najbolje u 2024. Sretna nova godina.
01.01.2024. (22:12) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...
starry night
Dečki, sretna vam Nova od srca, SVE NAJBOLJE! Baš mi je drago da ste se javili, moja mama je uvijek govorila da kad muško prvo čestita Novu je sreća, a žensko - nesreća :)))))))))))))))))))))) Hvala!
01.01.2024. (23:00) - - - - - promjene spremljene- uredi komentar - obriši komentar - prijavi ovaj komentar kao spam - zabrani komentiranje autoru ovog komentara- učitavam...