yangyi4

, became unwell during the last few weeks of the experiment, vibram five fingers and it was found necessary to kill him a few days after the experiment closed. As, however, his increase was fair at the commencement, and he actually lived to the end of the experiment, his weights are admitted into the calculations. vibram fivefingers This bad result, as to the health of the animals, is sufficiently general in the different pens to show that the explanation of it cannot be sought in the character of the special foods employed. vibram five fingers sale It is indeed more probable that the mangolds, and perhaps not immaterially the confinement also, were at fault.A glance at the fop line of results in the Table will show how very general throughout the pens was the loss of weight during the first 22 days. In the bottom one is given the total gain of each animal, inclusive of this preliminary period. This estimate, however, is an under-statement of the effects of the special foods, since it is affected both by the amount of dirt and moisture lost, and by the depreciation due to the inaptitude of the five fingers shoes succulent food employed. The results of the experimental period, on the other hand, being, as has been before observed, more probably in excess, depending chiefly on some few cases of individual irregularity. In some few instances, however, the somewhat excessive rates of gain of single animals, after the commencement of the experimental period, are seen not to have been preceded by a corresponding loss, and in such cases the results of the experimental period are not open to the objections referred to above.The average weekly gain of the animals is given in Table III.Looking across the columns of the Table, we see that whether we calculate from February 28, as skechers shape ups in the first division, or from March 20, as in the second, the rates of increase of different ' sheep upon the same food are very variable, and so general is the irregularity in all the pens, that it cannot be determined that one food was less subject to it than another. The variations are, however, more prominent on the experimental than upon the longer period—a circumstance already explained.Comparing the steeped malt and dust with the di~y malt and dust, we see that the dry gives the best results on the experimental period, and the steeped on the entire period : the discrepancy is due to the fact of a dissimilar condition of the animals in the two pens during the three weeks prior to the commencement of the Mbt shoes clearance experimental period—those on the dry malt losing in aggregate weight, whilst those on the steeped took better to their food at first, and did not, therefore, like the others, give afterwards an unnaturally rapid increase.The barley and malt were at first both steeped for about 12 or 14 hours, but it was thought that the barley at least was not sufficiently softened, and therefore the time of soaking was extended to 36 hours or more for both malt and barley. This seemed to increase the relish with which the barley was taken, but the malt was almost entirely refused, and so long as it was thus prepared very few mangolds either were eaten, and within a few days all the sheep were seen to be deteriorating,