Kad su moji klinci bili mali obožavali smo i oni su obožavali da im čitamo slikovnice. Kao Macu papučaricu, Tko je Vitku sašio košuljicu, Tapatapatavko, Barbara i 12 slonova i bezbroj drugih. Onda su došle priče, bajke i sve ostalo što nije ovisilo o slikama. Jel znate Čapekovu doktorsku bajku? Ako ne, samo recite, već je ionako vrijeme za reizdanje.
Dan danas u našoj familiji rečenica iz Malog pekara „Nije lako, ali je lijepo i korisno biti pekar“ ima mitsko značenje. Sad smo svi odrasli pa je valjda vrijeme da vidimo što je s drugim profesijama. Najbolje da počnemo sa svojima.
Imam prijatelja matematičara u Americi. Zove se Pete Casazza. Pete je jedan sjajan tip, totalno neobičan i jednostavan kako se samo još na filmovima može vidjeti. Osobito mi je drago da je upravo Pete prvi moj gost. Evo vam Petea. Uživajte!
Pete Casazza, A MATHEMATICIAN’S SURVIVAL GUIDE
1. An Algebra Teacher I could Understand
Television news reporter Cokie Roberts once said:
As long as algebra is taught in school, there will be prayer in school.
1.1. An Object of Pride. Our relationship with the general public most
closely resembles bipolar disorder. Almost everyone has had at least one bad
experience with mathematics during some part of their education. So at the
same time they admire us and hate us. Get into any taxi and tell the driver
you are a mathematician and the response is predictable. First, there is silence
while the driver relives his greatest nightmare  taking algebra. Next, you will
hear the immortal words: ”I was never any good at mathematics.” My response
is: ”I was never any good at being a taxi driver so I went into mathematics.”
You can learn a lot from taxi drivers if you just don’t tell them you are a
mathematician. Why get started on the wrong foot?
The mathematician David Mumford put it:
”I am accustomed, as a professional mathematician, to living in a sort of
vacuum, surrounded by people who declare with an odd sort of pride that they
are mathematically illiterate.”
1.2. A Balancing Act. The other most common response we get from the
public is: ”I can’t even balance my checkbook.” This reflects the fact that the
public thinks that mathematics is basically just adding numbers. They have no
idea what we really do. Because of the textbooks they studied, they think that
all needed mathematics has already been discovered. They think ”research” in
mathematics is library research. They have no idea that mathematicians can’t
balance their checkbooks either  although for reasons different from theirs.
1.3. Accounting to the Public. The public sees us as slightly mad geniuses
since we take for granted things which they cannot even imagine. They see
us as aliens who are just visiting this planet long enough to make their lives
miserable. They are not sure if they should be talking to us or running for
the exit. They are pleasantly surprised if they discover we can hold a normal
conversation with a mere mortal. We like being ”geniuses” to the public. If
we must have a false mystique, this is probably the best we could ever hope
for. The problem is that their definition of ”genius” is quite different from
ours. That is why they can think of actors as creative and mathematicians as
accountants who can balance checkbooks.
1.4. We Have Major Problems. This view of mathematicians as ”geniuses”
creates problems. Many students are discouraged from entering mathematics
since their teachers don’t see them as brilliant enough to be in the field. Believing
that success comes from innate talent takes away any control you have
over your career. And after being classified as a genius, you try to live up
to this expectation only to discover that brilliant inspirations are few and far
between. And if you manage to do something spectacular, you can easily become
obsessed with trying to outdo this by working only on the major problems
which have ruined the careers of many mathematicians before you.
1.5. Our ”15 Minutes of Fame”. We keep waiting for the public to give us
some positive form of recognition. But even when they defer to mathematics,
it is often facetious such as the common expression today: ”You do the math.”
And it does not help with the public to remove our mantle of mathematician
and replace it with faculty since it just lands us on the sword of Publicist
William F. Buckley:
”I would rather entrust the government of the United States to
first 400 people listed in the Boston telephone directory than to the
faculty of Harvard University.”
Perhaps our relationship with the public is best summarized by the following
scene from the television series Law and Order. Two police officers are standing
over a dead body in a high school classroom.
First officer: ”An art teacher. I can’t believe she ever hurt anyone.”
Second officer: ”An algebra teacher I could understand.”
2. ”All My Imaginary Friends Like Me” : Nikolas Bourbaki
A famous satirist and mathematicianTom Lehrer once said:
”Some of you may have met mathematicians and wondered how
they got that way.”
2.1. Fulfilling Careers in Mathematics. Mathematicians form a broad
spectrum of personalities from ”normal” to isolated, introverted, etc. We
have a different definition of normal precisely so that we can declare ourselves
in this category. Mathematicians from a very tender age may see themselves
as different. Worse, those around you may see you as different. The word
nerd arose so people would have at least some definable category to put us
into. This partly comes with the territory. The very traits which make us
good at mathematics work against us in society. A minimal requirement in
mathematics is a certain level of being obsessive compulsive. An obsession is a
”persistent recurring thought”, while a compulsion is ”a action a person feels
compelled to carry out over and over.” What abnormal psychology texts see
as a ”disorder”  we embrace. They refer to the bad side effects of obsessive
compulsive behavior as:
”Emphasis on logic and reasoning over feeling and intuition.”
”Keeping everything in order and under strict control.”
O.K. But I am still waiting for the bad side effects?
As if this isn’t enough, take a look at Asperger’s Syndrome. ”A condition on
the autistic spectrum. It includes repetitive behavior patterns and impairment
in social interaction.” Finally, they end with the punch line:
”These characteristics can often lead to fulfilling careers in mathematics,
engineering and the sciences”.
Thank you. We needed that recognition. The main point is that the very
traits that make us good as mathematicians  make us not so good at social
interactions. So, many mathematicians are quite introverted. Luckily, in a
group of mathematicians, you can easily tell the extrovert. She is the one
looking at your shoes when she is talking to you.
2.2. Adapting to Intelligence. After reading about these ”disorders” I am
not sure if I should be removing my two favorite signs from my wall:
Gone crazy. Be back shortly.
Anything worth doing is worth overdoing.
People like to say there is a thin line between genius and psychosis. And
there are many famous cases where mathematicians fell over the line (Go see
the movie ”A beautiful mind”). The problem is that mathematics did not
make us high functioning psychotics, or we could walk away and take care of
it. Rather, it was precisely these characteristics which drove us into an area
which finds all our strange behaviors as completely normal  even desirable.
Employers like us because we question everything  even those things they
have held sacred forever. This gives them a chance of making real needed
changes in their company. But these same qualities can alienate those around
us who don’t like having someone questioning everything. Their worlds are
comfortable precisely because they don’t constantly question their surroundings.
As if things are not bad enough, it is almost impossible to tell a nonmathematician
what we are doing. They don’t have the patience or blackboard
space to contain the 12 definitions we need to begin the discussion.
And if we really try to explain ourselves, we just look even more abnormal to
someone who could not possibly comprehend why anyone in this universe  or
any parallel universe  could possibly derive excitement from this.
As the mathematician [and my partner] Janet Tremain puts it:
Intelligence is maladaptive.
3. An Explosive Subject
A quote of unknown origin goes:
A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.
3.1. Entering Nobel’s Mind. Alfred Nobel died on December 10th, 1896
leaving the major part of his vast fortune to fund the ”Nobel Prize” which
was designed to reward ”science, literature and the quest for peace.” It was to
be given to those who ”shall have conferred the greatest benefit on mankind.”
Mathematics was not honored with a prize. For a long time mathematicians
speculated about why there was no Nobel Prize in Mathematics. The reasons
went from the ridiculous to the sublime. For an area which lives off ”truth”,
it was surprising how easily we were able to distort historical truth. Actually,
we have no idea why Nobel did not have a prize in mathematics. I personally
believe in the view given by Garding and Hormander: ”The true answer to
the question [why there is no Nobel Prize in Mathematics] is that, for natural
reasons, the thought of a prize in mathematics never entered Nobel’s mind.”
3.2. A Field of Dreams. At the 1924 International Congress of Mathematicians
a resolution was adopted to create medals to recognize outstanding mathematical
achievement  later to be called the Fields Medal after J.C. Fields
the Secretary of the Congress. The Medal is awarded every four years on the
occasion of the ICM to recognize ”outstanding mathematical achievement for
existing work and for the promise of future achievement.” I guess to leave
adequate room for ”future achievement”, the Medal is awarded only to mathematicians below the age of 40. To here all was fine. We have an award for
the best of the best young people to recognize their mathematical talents.
But this all went awry when mathematicians started referring to this as the
mathematical equivalent to the Nobel Prize. This left us looking foolish and
ridiculous outside the field when we claimed to have the equivalent to the Nobel
Prize but it is not given for the most significant achievements in mathematics,
but rather for the youngest most significant achievements. Unfortunately,
this mistake has worked its way into wikipedia and a number of other popular
venues.
3.3. Exploding With Success. The International Mathematical Union seems
incapable of addressing the issue of a Nobel Prize in mathematics. Some people
have sested, for example, using the Abel Prize. The only saving grace
here is that a new Nobel Prize in Economics was added in 1969 and so we can
hope for our turn one day.
By the way, Alfred Nobel was a Swedish chemist and engineer. A series
of disastrous accidents in his lab left a number of people dead (including his
youngest brother Emil) while he tried to learn how to stabilize nitroglycerine.
Eventually succeeding, he called his discovery dynamite and it was this invention
which generated the massive fortune he used to fund the Nobel Prize.
Nobel himself described 1860 as the time when he ”made nitroglycerine explode
with success.”
4. The Goalkeeper
When Jean Bourgain was just starting his career, Janet Tremain (a student
at the time) asked him what his goals were. He said with a smile: To win
a Fields Medal (The highest level award available at the time); To be at the
Advanced Institute (The highest level position in mathematics); and to make
a lot of money (Impossible in mathematics).
4.1. Scoring Goals. When you enter mathematics, you will have to set your
goals for your career. If you set your goals too high, you will spend your
entire career frustrated and unhappy that you can’t achieve what you want.
We have enough stories in mathematics already about mathematicians ending
their careers bitter and angry that they were not able to live up to their own
unrealistic goals. For most of us, all we can hope for is to become ”a first rate 
second rate mathematician”. This is already a lofty goal. There are just a tiny
number of first rate mathematicians. Luckily, an army can’t move forward if
it consists only of generals. It takes a broad spectrum of mathematicians with
all kinds of different talents to propel the subject forward. Also, the most
critical need in mathematics is for truly creative ideas  and these can come
from anyone.
4.2. Today is Yesterday’s Tomorrow. Keep in mind also that for most of
your career you will be ”in progress” working on a project. If you only get
enjoyment from major victories, you will have very few moments of happiness.
You need to learn to enjoy the process of doing mathematics so that you can
enjoy every day of your career. Yes, mathematics can be the most frustrating
endeavor in the universe. It gives up its riches very grudgingly. And since we
have declared this as our profession, we cannot be satisfied without rewards.
But we can still enjoy the process of discovery even on a frustrating day when
we make negative progress. That is a day when we realize that what we tried
to do yesterday is false. But we can’t move forward without that small insight.
When asked once how he is day was going, the cartoon figure Charlie Brown
responded:
”I keep hoping yesterday will be better.”
4.3. Moving the Goalposts. Mathematics can be the perfect partner  fulfilling
your every need. Or it can be your greatest nightmare  frustrating you
at every turn. You are the goalkeeper of your career. If you tie your ego to
your success, you will end up as a ring without identity.
By the way, Bourgain reached all three of his ”goals” and much more (such
as becoming a member of the National Academy of Sciences) at a very young
age. So be sure not to set your goals too low. Or at least be prepared to move
the goalposts as you go along.
5. Group Theory
Since your career in mathematics might be lengthy, please keep in mind the
fundamental rule for long term group interaction:
Friends come and go, but enemies accumulate.
5.1. Simple Groups. When I went to my first mathematics meetings I noticed
that the ”stars” all hung out together, ate together etc. I assumed that
we were not to disturb the group until we had built up enough mathematical
currency. I later learned that this was not necessarily the case. Over years of
being in a subject, other mathematicians may be our longest lasting friends.
We have shared their marriages, raising of children (bunnies in my case) and
the ups and downs of life. So we are glad to see old friends and catch up on
what is going on with them. This is not designed as a slight on all the people
we don’t know so well. Getting into the group may not be a completely simple
matter. But in my groups, at least, it is semisimple. So give it a try.
5.2. The Inverse Elements. If things don’t work out as you expected, don’t
let this discourage you. At my first math meeting I stopped Mr. Big in the
hallway and said: ”Hi. I am Pete Casazza. Would you have time to answer a
question?” The response was: ”Who are you?” Since I had a name tag and had
just introduced myself, I quickly realized that this was mathematics speak
for ”Why are you important enough for me to talk to?” Since it was my first
meeting, I concluded that overrating one’s importance in the universe was a
necessary condition for being a mathematician. Actually, such an experience
is almost unheard of in mathematics and nothing near it ever happened to me
again. But be prepared to meet a very broad spectrum of egos during your
career.
6. Mathematics is Ageless
The comedian Jack Benny once said:
Age is a question of mind over matter. If you don’t mind, it doesn’t matter.
6.1. The Age of Reason. Mathematicians have a paranoia about age. We
are told from our earliest days that mathematics is a young person’s game;
that mathematicians do all their best work before the age of 40. This paranoia
is made worse by the fact that the Fields Medal (see section 3) has to be won
before the age of forty. For a group which lives off logic, it is difficult to see
how they so desperately hold onto this idea despite being faced with a very
large number of counterexamples amongst us. Under this system, we should
hand someone their Fields Medal for being the best and the brightest of the
younger generation and say: ”Here is your medal. By the way, your career is
over.”
6.2. Our Silver Anniversary. At one time, we would hold a special conference
to honor a mathematician’s 70th birthday. This made sense because that
was often the forced retirement age. Today we have broadened our scope to
honor the 60th, 65th, and 70th birthdays. But there is a segment of the community
who is afraid to have this ”honor” since it is tantamount to announcing
the end of your career. If this age paranoia continues then I would sest we
stop having such age related honor meetings. Instead, why not have a special
meeting for the 25th (30th etc) anniversary of someone’s entering mathematics?
This would, of course, be your silver anniversary. But it would be better
if we could just face this whole topic realistically in the first place.
7. Workman’s Compensation
A famous actor Will Smith claimed that he had only average talent. That
all his success stemmed from hard work.
”When the other guy is sleeping, I am working. When the other guy is
vacationing, I am working. When the other guy is making love, I ... uh ...
well, I am doing the same. But I am working really hard at it.”
7.1. Input verses Output. As a student thinking about entering mathematics,
don’t be intimidated by its mystique. You do not have to be a genius to
be a mathematician with a successful career. It helps to be of above average
intelligence, but the most important tool at your disposal is hard work.
Mathematics is not a sprint but rather a marathon. Hard work over a long
period of time will pay off. It has been noted that today a large percentage
of all gifted students severely underestimate their abilities. This comes from
underrating the importance of effort. The system designed to help them is
actually working against them. They are praised for being ”gifted” which is
something out of their control and therefore has limitations. When praised
for their hard work instead, gifted students usually set higher standards, take
more risks to succeed and expect more of themselves. As Tom Lehrer once
said:
Life is like a sewer. What you get out of it depends upon what
you put into it.
If you put your best efforts into mathematics you have a reasonably good
chance of a successful career.
7.2. Some Inspiration. Fields Medalist Terence Tao put work in its place
quite eloquently:
”The popular image of the lone (and possibly slightly mad) genius  who
ignores the literature and other conventional wisdom and manages by some
inexplicable inspiration (enhanced, perhaps, with a liberal dash of suffering) to
come up with a breathtakingly original solution to a problem that confounded
all the experts  is a charming and romantic image, but also a wildly inaccurate
one, at least in the world of modern mathematics. We do have spectacular,
deep and remarkable results and insights in this subject, of course, but they are
the hardwon and cumulative achievement of years, decades, or even centuries
of steady work and progress of many good and great mathematicians.”
”Actually, I find the reality of mathematical research today  in which
progress is obtained naturally and cumulatively as a consequence of hard work,
directed by intuition, literature, and a bit of luck  to be far more satisfying
than the romantic image that I had as a student of mathematics being advanced
primarily by the mystic inspirations of some rare breed of ”geniuses”.
We have an expression for this in mathematics:
Success in mathematics is 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration.
8. A Confidence Game
When Nobel Prize winning Physicist Albert Einstein’s father asked the
school principal what vocation his son should choose, the response was:
It doesn’t matter, he’ll never succeed at anything.
8.1. The Advantages of Mathematics. One of the greatest challenges to
your career will be to maintain your confidence  without being overconfident.
Everything around you will be constantly testing your confidence. You are
working on problems which appear unsolvable. You are constantly being evaluated
for grants, jobs, promotion, tenure, raises etc. Deciding who will be
the main speakers at meetings will be an evaluation process. Even when you
achieve a great victory in your research, the first question that arises is: ”Can
I top this?” No matter how good you are, there is always someone better out
there. There will be people around you who are faster, more knowledgeable,
and more creative than you. This does not mean that you don’t belong in
mathematics. As T. Tao put it:
”This is the common mistake of mistaking absolute advantage for comparative
advantage. ... As long as you have education, interest, and a
reasonable amount of talent, there will be some part of mathematics where
you can make a solid and useful contribution.”
8.2. In Praise of Mathematics. You will have to maintain your own confidence.
Mathematicians are very stingy with praise. You will likely never hear
someone say: ”That was a great theorem. Thank you for bringing it to us.”
Or ”Your book has greatly improved my mathematical life.” Unfortunately,
this is not part of the psyche of mathematicians  but it should be. For some
[natural?] reasons, the thought of praise never enters mathematician’s mind.
8.3. True or False Questions. One of the most difficult problems in mathematics
is learning how to balance proper respect for our significant others
while maintaining a healthy respect for ourselves. If your whole measure of
a human being is their mathematical achievements, you will be constantly
undermining your own confidence. I often admonish my students for talking
to themselves in the negative: ”That was a dumb statement” or ”That was
really stupid on my part”. I believe they became accustomed to doing that
as a defense mechanism. If they say it first, it takes away the opportunity for
others to say it. But every psychological study around shows that how we talk
to ourselves is being heavily recorded in our subconscious and is forming our
view of ourselves. Mathematical statements are not smart or dumb. They are
only true or false.
You cannot afford to lose the confidence game:
Confidence Game: A swindle in which the victim is defrauded after his
or her confidence has been won.
9. You Can’t Outrun a Bear
The comedian George Carlin once said:
Where are we going? And what’s with this hand basket?
9.1. Wonderful Advances. When I first joined the mathematics community
I was excited to join a group dedicated to advancing mathematics. I had a
rude awakening when it became clear that we were really working to advance
ourselves. This is an unfortunate consequence of the reality around us. We
must all compete for very scarce research grants, positions, promotion, tenure,
awards, raises etc. But we need to be careful that this reality does not diminish
our enjoyment of the subject. We need to be able to go to meetings and be
excited and overjoyed at some wonderful advances  done by someone else. One
always goes away feeling a little behind, but this is one of the main functions
of meetings. They infuse us with added energy and drive to go home and do
something serious.
9.2. A ”NonProfit” Organization. Mathematics is going through some
difficult times at the moment. We have a shortage of jobs, too low salaries,
much of our funding is disappearing as the defense department shifts funds
from mathematics and the National Science Foundation is funding only 15%
20% of the submitted proposals. Even NSF’s figure is quite under stated since
more and more mathematicians are not even applying to NSF because the
chances of being funded are so poor. At this time, the NSF budget is about $6
billion  approximately what the government will spend in 14 hours. Apparently,
no one told them that serious researchers put in a 28 hour work day. An
added problem is that even if NSF gets an ”inflationary raise”, the research
they can support diminishes since they are supporting the most significant
researchers in the sciences and engineering who are getting significantly above
an inflationary raise. Apparently, the U.S. Government sees us as a not for
profit group. They seem to have forgotten that this country has reached its
current status by being the world leader in research. And while they consider
increasing research funding to deal with the monumental problems facing the
U.S. and the world, they are clueless that these problems would not even be
here if they had adequately funded research in the first place. Worse, as they
target research money to what they believe will give immediate relief to our
problems, they will continue to underfund the futuristic research which represents
the real long term future of the country  leaving us to wait for the next
crisis we are not prepared for. This brings to mind an old proverb:
If two wrongs don’t make a right  try a third.
9.3. Assisted Suicide. This is the right time for us all to come together for
the good of the subject. We have three major math societies in the U.S.: The
Mathematical Association of America (MAA) representing students and teachers
of mathematics; The American Mathematical Society (AMS) representing
pure mathematics; and the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
(SIAM) representing applied mathematics. Since I worked for 25 years in pure
math and then switched into applied math and have been an active participant
in the MAA, I have had an opportunity to witness all these groups in action.
The pure math group looks down on the applied math group claiming they
are not doing serious math. The applied math group looks down on the pure
math group claiming they are developing deeper and more isolated theories
which not only separate themselves further from applications but are isolating
themselves even from other areas of pure math. Both of these groups have a
certain level of disrespect for the ”teaching wing”. This is somewhat ridiculous
since most of us are employed as teachers and doing research is desirable
(or even required) but not viewed as our most important function by state
legislatures.
At one time, all of mathematics grew out of applications. To establish its
identity, it was natural that mathematics would separate itself from applications
to build an independent future. But now it is time for us to come
together. When I switched into applied math, the first thing I discovered
was that some of the most important questions in pure math were not being
addressed because they did not show up naturally there. They only showed
up when one tried to apply the theory. Given the significant challenges facing
mathematics, it is time for all the societies and mathematicians of all
persuasions to come together for the good of the subject. But their natural
inclination seems to be to compete instead of cooperate. Mathematics has
become its own worst enemy  assisting in our own suicide.
9.4. Primitive Ideals. To understand all of the apparent contradictions above,
I need to recall a story we used to tell in the boy scouts.
Two boy scouts are out hiking when they see a bear charging at them. One
scout sits down, takes his running shoes out of his backpack and starts to put
them on. The conversation goes:
First Scout: Why are you putting on running shoes? You can’t
outrun a bear.
Second Scout: I don’t have to outrun the bear. I only have to outrun
you.
10. A Black Cat Which Isn’t There
A quote sometimes credited to Einstein goes:
”If I knew what I was doing, it wouldn’t be called research.”
Mathematics differs from the other sciences in that we are attempting to
capture truth while in other sciences they are trying to approximate truth. We
also differ from the other sciences in that new discoveries don’t falsify the old
ones but instead extend what was known to capture a broader truth. What
changes over time is our understanding of the mathematics  what it means
and how it fits into the broader picture.
A story in the mathematics community is used to explain the difference
between a mathematician and a physicist. Physicists work for ten years on a
difficult problem and when they are done they say: ”I am a genius for figuring
this out.” Mathematicians work for ten years on a problem and when they are
done they say: ”I am an idiot. The answer was obvious.” Although this is
exaggerated  as this whole article is  it does contain a shred of truth. Most
mathematics, once completely uncovered seems somewhat obvious. But this
should not be used to downgrade the enormous effort that went into it the
first time.
As Charles Darwin put it:
”A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room looking for a
black cat which isn’t there.”
11. My Most Read Paper
A famous review of a published math paper reads:
The results in this paper are false. But the mistakes are not new.
A MATHEMATICIAN’S SURVIVAL GUIDE 13
11.1. Name Dropping. When you enter mathematics, you hope to produce
that significant manuscript which will identify you forever as a major player
in the field. We actually associate many mathematicians with their most
significant contributions. Andrew Wiles will forever be attached to his solution
to the 300 year old problem affectionately known as: ”Fermat’s Last Theorem”.
But this system also has its drawbacks. Max Zorn will forever be revered in
mathematics for his discovery of Zorn’s Lemma. Unfortunately, he made this
discovery in his PhD thesis and our association negates his whole illustrious
career after that. But the fact is that few mathematicians will ever reach that
level of significance and recognition. You will need to be satisfied with a name
tag at meetings.
11.2. The Citation Index. You will have to develop enough confidence in
yourself to be comfortable around people who just assume they are smarter
than you. Otherwise, you will constantly be trying to broadcast your achievements
to build up your own confidence. In my department, just in case you
missed the significance of someone, they feel compelled to remind you with a
complete lack of subtlety. ”In my recent paper in the ”Annals”, I showed ...”.
This is mathematics speak for: ”I am important since my last paper appeared
in the highest level pure math journal.” Not to be outdone, I cannot resist
tooting my own horn and telling them about:
My Most Read Paper
One time I received an urgent message from a journal saying that I was
holding up publication since I had not returned the galley proofs of my article.
I replied that I had never received them. They resent them overnight mail and
I managed to get them back quickly. Two months later, the original galley
proofs arrived in a completely mangled package with multiple wrappings, tape
and string. Inside was a disk which contained the tex file of my article. On
the various levels of covers it was clear that my disk had racked up a large
number of frequent flyer miles. Its first trip was to Columbia, South America.
Apparently, someone at the post office decided that Columiba, MO was in
South America. The next stop for the manuscript was Venezuela followed
later by Argentina. The last two addresses were in Washington, D.C. It isn’t
hard to figure out what happened. This strange disk with all its tex symbols
ended up in the country of Columbia where they quickly realized that this
was something of real significance. Clearly these strange symbols represented
the entire operation for the largest drug cartel in the area. All they had to
do was put enough agents on it to decipher it. Failing this, they enlisted the
help of the secret service in Venezuela who certainly would decipher it. After
passing through Argentina, there was only one group left who had a chance
of breaking up this drug ring and that had to be in Washington, D.C. By
my estimate, untold hundreds of dedicated drug enforcement officials went
through this manuscript with a fine tooth comb. This certainly has to be my
most read manuscript  even if it is a little short of citations.
12. The Real Beauty of Mathematics
Author unknown: The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its
limits.
12.1. An Intelligence Test. Many mathematicians think of themselves as
being more intelligent than the general public and even other scientists. Such
a conclusion requires one to change the definition of IQ which is basically
just that which intelligence tests measure. Intelligence tests do not even
measure any nontrivial mathematics. They do measure elementary logical
reasoning which most scientists use but only mathematicians have turned into
a god. But there is no evidence supporting our innate belief in our superior
intelligence. Certainly, one needs a certain amount of intelligence to work
in mathematics. But we feel compelled to define intelligence as being good at
mathematics. This is what allows faculty to sit in the lounge talking about how
stupid the students are. In whose dictionary is ”not being good at mathematics”
the definition of stupid? I.E. one does not have to be good at mathematics
to be intelligent. The problem is that when one devotes their whole lives to
a subject, we naturally begin to believe this is the only important thing to
do. Grothendieck was one of the greatest minds of the last century. His
manuscripts kept mathematicians busy for forty years just trying to fully understand
this oracle. One day Grothendieck walked away from mathematics
and became a farmer. This sacrilidge was an unending topic of conversation
forever at meetings since mathematicians just could not comprehend that
someone so good at mathematics would choose not to do it. Clearly, if you
are brilliant at math, you must do it.
12.2. Real Talent. It is difficult to work in mathematics without developing
a certain amount of arrogance. But arrogance stems from seeing ourselves as
better, smarter and more intelligent than others  both inside and outside of
mathematics. But this is not an winning long term strategy. It only works
as long as others are the idiots you think they are. But when someone significantly
better than you comes along [and they always do come along in
mathematics] you will spend the rest of your career trying to raise arrogance
to the level of an art form so it will hide your clinical depression. There is a
A MATHEMATICIAN’S SURVIVAL GUIDE 15
long list of famous mathematicians who ended their careers bitter and unfulfilled.
It is easy to be arrogant. But it takes real confidence and talent not to
show it. Arrogance will not prevent you from being a significant mathematician,
but it will remove 50% of the rewards  which involve your interactions
with a spectacular group of dedicated mathematicians.
Perhaps Janet Tremain summed it up best:
The real beauty of mathematics
is that
you don’t have to be intelligent to do it.
13. An Eating Disorder
Professional baseball player Yogi Berra was asked by a waiter if he wanted
his pizza cut into four pieces or eight pieces. He replied:
”Four. I don’t think I can eat eight.”
Going to dinner with mathematicians is a culinary experience from the
fourth dimension. Only mathematicians could turn dinner into such a level of
competition that it would qualify as an Olympic event. It is a five hour ordeal
which sometimes even includes 30 minutes of actual eating.
13.1. We’ve Got to Lower Our Standards. Our first job is to pick the
restaurant. This is where experience and wisdom pays off. Having spent
enough meals denying that I had anything to do with the selection of this
”godawful place”, I play silence of the lambs. As the experts work out the
definition of a good restaurant, the rest of us are recalling the last time we
interfered and thought we might have heard: ”When I want your opinion  I
will give it to you.” After 30 minutes, we have finally arrived at a consensus
 that we are hopelessly deadlocked and getting very hungry. We decide that
our only choice is to walk down the street and see what is available. After
walking far enough for the person behind me to work out a new stopping
time algorithm (I wish I had put on my running shoes) and reading enough
menus to fill the entire conference proceedings, we have come to agreement on
a place. Unfortunately for us, by the time we all read the menu, the place
closed. We realize that we have no choice but to lower our standards while a
few restaurants are still open. We decide to take the next place, whatever it
is.
13.2. A Seat at the Table. Entering Joe’s: Eat At Your Own Risk
restaurant, we proceed to the ancient ritual of correct seating order which
amounts to organizing an elephant stamped into the order of importance of
16 P.G. CASAZZA
the elephants. This can make musical chairs look like child’s play. There are
more than 87 billion different ways 14 people can sit around a table and these
guys are determined to try every one. Unfortunately, allowing 1 minute to try
out each new position, it would take more than 160,000 years to exhaust all
possible ways of seating 14 people around a table. It is best if you just sit at
the bar and discuss algebra with the bartender until the dust settles. Anyway,
you are at least guaranteed a seat this way.
13.3. Stop Global Whining. Next is the wine tasting competition. This has
several different events such as: Who knows the most expensive wines?; Who
tasted the most wines on the list  and where?; Who drinks only wines from
their own country  and why? Some people are already begging me for the
glass of wine I brought from the bar. Finally we get through the last part of
the competition: Who can send back the most bottles of wine? It is over except
for assigning grades to the winners: It is too young, too warm, too cool, too
spicy, doesn’t go with the meal ... I give my two cents: At least the cork smells
good and the label is pretty.
13.4. Extreme Sports. Dinner discussion for mathematicians raises competition
to a higher plane. We are compelled to establish some sort of mathematical
pecking order: the best, the worst, most creative, most potential ... Then
we need to relive the same dimensions with side conditions: biggest drinker,
oldest, youngest, most arrogant, best driver, knows a lot about ... (Did I just
hear the name Grothendieck mentioned?). We feel compelled to identify all
the extremes. After all, being average at anything is the greatest insult we
can assign. Didn’t we have this discussion last year? Who won?
13.5. A Taxing Situation. Finally, the waiter arrives and asks: ”Do you
want separate checks?” No thanks, we can do the math. Everyone starts talking
to themselves computing what and how much or anything shared they had.
We wind our way through bantering, trading, assigning weights for students,
postdocs, untenured professors (why not emeritus?) grant supported or not,
tax/tips etc. Running out of napkins to write on, someone is using the tablecloth
as a calculator while others stare at the ceiling trying to concentrate
on the calculations. Each of us finally gets our bill figured to the exact cent.
Who says we can’t balance a checkbook? Unfortunately, everyone has only
$20 bills. It is time to start making out the I.O.U.’s Does anyone have any
paper?
As we get up from the table to leave, I make my first serious mistake of
the evening (there goes my ”nohitter”) and ask: ”Does anyone know the best
way to get home?” . . . God I wish I never said that. There’s 30 minutes of
my life I will never get back.
14. The Introduction  Finally
This article is intended as a survival guide for those students, teachers and
mathematicians who are having trouble interpreting the mathematical experience.
If you read only this article, you will get a distorted image of the overall
situation in mathematics. A comprehensive view of the subject would fill a
textbook  preferably one on abnormal psychology. In lieu of this, the MAA
has put out this book. Therefore, this article is purposely representative of
nothing but my own personal experiences during 36 years of being a mathematician.
To get a better view of mathematics and mathematicians, you will
need to read the other carefully crafted articles in this book. Each issue raised
in this article needed much more discussion. But my goal was only to raise
these topics as items that the mathematics community needs to address. My
long list of personal opinions on them is not particularly important. It was
just important that I make them controversial enough to stimulate the much
needed discussion.
If my article annoys you so much that you feel compelled to speak out  please
do so since it means that I have done my job. This book is not designed to be
the beginning of the end of the story but rather the end of the beginning. My
light hearted approach to this task is my response to the sad fact that no one
has ever accused mathematicians of not taking themselves seriously enough.
15. The Last 10 Minutes
Being a mathematician is the greatest job in the world. Every day is even
more exciting than the last. Each day starts with mental gymnastics. And
today has the potential of being the day that you finally crack that tough nut.
It is a challenging, very stimulating, treasure hunt. It is creative brainstorming
at its best. Most of the nonmathematicians my age I know are already burned
out and are trying to hang on until retirement. But even after 36 years of doing
mathematics, I go to bed at 2 pm in the afternoon and get up at 10 o’clock
at night so I can get to the thing I love as early as possible. This of course
occurred because of my obsessive compulsive nature. I started getting up at
5 am so I could get two hours of research done before going to the university.
Then I figured out that getting up at 4 am gave me an extra hour. After a
short time I was getting up at 10 pm. Pretty soon I won’t have to go to bed
since I will be getting up at that time. The point is, few people will have
the opportunity to have a career that is so constantly exciting, rewarding and
challenging that they cannot imagine retiring from it. When you get into it
you will realize that a day without mathematics is a day without sunshine. So
if you are not yet one of us, come join in. Lighten up, chill out, relax ... it’s
just mathematics and you are just a person. Enjoy the treasure hunt.
Someone asked me once if I planned on doing mathematics my whole life. I
gave the obvious answer:
”Of course not. I plan on saving the last 10 minutes to reminisce.”
Acknowledgment I fretted for almost a year over how I was going to write
(or even approach) this article. Then I attended the GPOTS conference at the
University of Cincinnati and spent the week carefully discussing this article
with my friends and colleagues. It soon was completely clear what I needed to
write. Returning home, I wrote this entire article in two days. I am indebted
to everyone who attended the meeting for all their insights and for just being
their wonderful selves. A special thanks goes to Don Hadwin for supplying
the creative title for section 2. A large portion of the material for this article
came from Janet Tremain who gives a new definition to photographic memory.
I sat for hours while she played video tapes stored in her mind recounting
minute events in our past interactions with mathematicians. One example:
she replayed a dinner we had twenty years ago with a group of mathematicians,
describing where each person sat at the table, what each person ate, who sent
back their steak to be cooked more, what wine/beer each person drank, and
each conversation going on at the table. My response: ”Janet, you are scaring
me!”
