First take a look at these three videos:
19 Yr Old Girl Reacts To Women 'Monkey Branching'
BEWARE! There's 3 Sides To Every Woman
Women Are Terrified That Men Will Realize THIS
My comment:
Another interesting thing is how a number of women, despite being calculating etc. make the wrong choices and consistently chase men who will not stick with them, while ignoring or using the good boys. So the "myth" of bad men may come from the choices many women consistently do, concentrating on the top attractive men and using the rest, but being ultimately rejected by the top men who have a lot of options.
Funny thing though, narcissist men (falsely) appear to display the most ostentatiously the masculine qualities women search, and then if a woman gets with such a man, she will get burned. Apparently, the calculations many women do, often lead to failure. That tendency seems increased these days because social media potentiate hypergamy, but also makes 80-90% of women chase the 20-10% top attractive men, which potentiates the chances for failure for women, who then settle for the "unattractive" good boys, and then divorce easily because the divorce laws in most Western countries so heavily favor women.
Interestingly, the more a man develops his masculinity, the less he is inclined to fall in love with a woman, because he sees women as they are, not those angels worthy of worship, but just cute little instinctual animals. The exception being if such a man meets a woman who is really an individualized human being, but even then, he will not feel the kind of love boys feel, but will establish a mature life union with the woman, but even then by never relinquishing his masculinity position of "King" and Patriarch.
There might be an evolutionary reason for boyish love for women though, and it's not just about the "luxury" men have to do it. A species is more successful when a number of men are like that, because their tendency to invest themselves in an ideal makes them protect women and children and do great things in self sacrifice. Very masculine men can do it too, but only out of individualized awareness, not so much out of biological programming to "love" and lose themselves in that love.
But the thing is that men were far more protected by marriage laws in the past than they are now, so they could have that boyish neotenic attitude, but in the present times it doesn't work anymore and "success" with women goes through heightened animal masculinity, which could even lead to biological degeneracy. We already have increased animalization in the cultural sphere, but that could lead to negative partner selection leading to the loss of biological programming for higher idealistic motives in men and a progressive biological dehumanization of the species, particularly of the White race, because that same process seems to have happened with the Black race, and in the present cultural context, the White race faces the same danger.
If we want to save our race, we must reestablish patriarchal social structures, as they protect men who have that ability to be more than just animal males, but at the same time teach those men to be more masculine in a truly human, aware, individualized way - to become real Patriarchs.
A patriarchal culture also teaches women to be more than their animal programming and become true individualized human beings with higher motives and ideals.
BTW. a real Patriarch Man actually doesn't want to sleep with a woman just because she is attractive. His physical desire is dependent on the establishment of a higher spiritual relationship with a woman, but not like you probably think, because you probably think "emotions", which is not what spirituality is. Spirituality is about life: aware conscious life - self-activated aware life, instead of reactive instinctual life.
This is a higher level of life, an individualized, self aware, self activated life, not an automatic instinctual life anymore. This is what it means to be a realized individual, a realized human.
But is this just about individuals? For each individual yes, but what generates individuals is not just their personal journey. Culture, the collective software is extremely important - critical in the production of certain types of individuals in socially significant numbers. Culture is important, not just as an issue of conformity, but much more importantly in the way it can help or impede the development of a full mature individuality, an aware, individual self activated life, which is what "spirituality" really is.
It is a mistake to ignore the political, because culture is highly political, and the reduction of society to individuals is the greatest error of our times. Culture is not transforming itself only through software "updates", but these days those are not "updates" but bugs, and there must be a way to get rid culture of these bugs and make new correct software changes, and this is the domain of politics in relation to culture.
Of course this doesn't solve everything on the individual level, but is not only important but necessary. To avoid it means to not be completely consistent and not to push the logic of cultural "software" to its logical conclusion that this is an eminently political issue.
Who cares if you "don't like it" (or are you afraid of it?), it is not honest to dismiss the obvious need for politics.
Post je objavljen 19.03.2022. u 00:11 sati.