Despite having over three months to introduce legislation responding to the Court of
Justice of the European Union striking down the Data Retention Directive , an
'emergency' ip camera surveillance bill is being rammed through Parliament this week.
Not only does the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill (DRIP) fail to address
the privacy concerns laid out in the Court's judgment, it also drastically expands
spying powers of the State. ip camera wireless ip cameraWorringly, just this afternoon, the fast track timetable
was approved this afternoon by the House of Commons despite opposition from 49 MPs.
A final vote on DRIP is expected later this week. Below are the concerns laid out in
a briefing from Liberty, Privacy International, Open Rights Group, Big Brother Watch,
Article 19, and English PEN. 4ch NVR SystemEven without any significant Parliamentary scrutiny and
debate, we call on MPs to amend the Bill's sunset clause to make DRIP expire at the
end of the year. Given what we have learned over the past year about State
surveillance, and the public's growing discomfort with its secretive nature, the surveillance camera security systems
public deserve an open debate about how and under what conditions our agencies can
spy on us.
Disregard for democratic process and rule of law
While Government claims DRIP is merely responding to the CJEU decision and
'clarifying' existing surveillance powers, this could not be further from the truth.
DRIP makes no effort to address the main concern laid out in the CJEU ruling: that
blanket data retention is a significant interference with the right to privacy.
Further, DRIP greatly extends the State's communications interception powers overseas
under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA). For instance, under DRIP the network camera 4ch NVR system
government could compel network camera surveillance system foreign companies – including commonly used internet
services like Yahoo! and Facebook – to assist them in achieving their surveillance
aims.
Under DRIP, the legally questionable TEMPORA programme could be extended globally,
where we could see mass surveillance warrants served on owners of submarine cables
that do not even pass through the UK. 16ch NVR RecorderThe timing of this legislation could not be
more audacious, as just this week Privacy International, Liberty, and Amnesty
International meet with GCHQ in court challenging the TEMPORA programme and
information sharing between the UK and US governments.
In both process and substance, DRIP shows an utter disregard for the democratic
process and the rule of law. The misleading information coming from our elected
leaders is an affront to the British public, which has led to leading legal academics
across the UK to surveillance camera security systems debunk the assertion that the bill contains no new surveillance system
powers as false. In an open letter to Parliament, the scholars said that DRIP
Post je objavljen 12.08.2014. u 08:41 sati.