oemax,China key box factory

The major reason for the delay in declaring the results of law courses is a lack of faculty.  Meanwhile, MU’s law department is positive about declaring all the results by next week.” Law has only 102 faculty members for assessment and most of them are lawyers, so they can’t spend the entire day assessing answer sheets. It has been handed over to the central computing facility department, which will announce them by next week.Student groups, however, are unhappy with the move. “Advocates are lawyers. So far, no results have been announced pertaining to the law department.An official from MU’s law department stated on the condition of anonymity, “A teacher knows how to correct the paper and assign marks, which can’t be done by anyone except a teacher. Before issuing the circular, education minister Vinod Tawde had discussions with some lawyers.  The MU, via the circular, also sought the help of chartered accountants for the assessment of OEM pencil manufacturers the ‘taxation’ subject of the commerce department. “We had been called for a meeting where we were asked about what we feel about this programme,” said a senior lawyer. The results of final-year MU exams have been delayed for over three months.Mumbai University asks lawyers, CAs to assess papers THE ASIAN AGE. If any goof up happens, who will take responsibility? It is a criminal offence to waste a student’s year. How do you expect them to assess our answer sheets when they are not our professors? They don’t know our syllabus or the paper pattern. Dr Rashmi Oza, head of department said, “All post-graduation courses’ results assessment is done.The government will offer Rs 14 per paper to the lawyers. Just because they are lawyers, would they know everything about our law paper,” asked Sachin Pawar, president of Students’ Law Council and a law student. The student groups have opposed MU’s move

The university had cancelled his admission as he had failed to clear a semester II paper. India, Maharashtra, Mumbai (Bombay). However, after revaluation, he was declared failed and hence appeared for the same along with the fifth-semester papers and managed to clear the semester II paper on his fourth attempt.The university’s petition had contended that he had failed in the said paper in 2015 and thereafter failed in the subsequent next two attempts too in the academic year 2015-16.P. Upholding the University of Mumbai’s rule that stipulates that the failure to clear semester II will make a student ineligible for writing tests for semester V and VI, the Bombay high court rejected the petition of an undergraduate law student. He had managed to clear the semester III and IV exams and hence was given provisional admission in the third year consisting of the fifth and sixth semester as he had applied for revaluation of his third attempt in the Law of Crime paper. The university had cancelled his admission as he had failed to clear a semester II paper in the subject Law of Crimes before taking admission for the final year. The high court said the student’s exam results for semester V were null and void since he had not cleared the semester II test before appearing for the semester V exams. Colabawalla was hearing a writ petition filed by Deepak Agarwal seeking directions to the university to confirm his admission in the final year of the three-year LLB course for the academic year 2016-17.Mumbai University student’s plea to save a year rejected China book stand manufactures THE ASIAN AGE