ip camera system
08.08.2014., petak
security systems
|
The High Commissioner makes the important finding that the distinction between communications content and data is no longer persuasive, hopefully putting to bed once and for all arguments that privacy protections should be attenuated depending on iURL=http://www.ipcctvcamera.net]ip camera[/URL] surveillance camera whether surveillance captures content or metadata. The report rightly calls mandatory data retention what it really is – part of a State’s surveillance regime – and declares that it appears neither necessary or proportionate sufficient for it to comply with human rights law. Although this finding rides the wave of anti-data retention sentiment that has been building since the Court of Justice of the European Union found the EU Data Retention Directive to be in violation of human rights law, the fact that the High Commissioner has added her voice to those condemning mandatory data retention will no doubt prove to be critical as States such as the United Kingdom and Australia seek to revive the practice in the weeks and months ahead. 3. Intelligence sharing regimes may run afoul of human rights law The High Commissioner’s report provides some of the most robust and strongly-worded analysis security systems ip camera system of any international or regional human rights authority to date on the relationship between intelligence arrangements and human rights. She begins by striking to the heart of the Five Eyes surveillance alliance by declaring that “secret rules and secret interpretations – even secret judicial 4ch NVR System interpretations – of law do not have the necessary qualities of law.” Neither, the High Commissioner says, do laws or rules that give the executive authorities, such as security and intelligence servicessurveillance system , excessive discretion. The report thus seriously undermines the legal frameworks relied upon by the UK and US to attempt to justify their surveillance practices as lawful. In analysing intelligence-sharing relationships the report makes a damning finding for the Five Eyes, noting that there is “credible information to suggest that some Governments systematically have routed data collection and analytical tasks through jurisdictions with weaker safeguards for privacy,” network camera surveillance system operating a “transnational network of intelligence agencies through interlocking legal loopholes” designed to “outflank the protections of domestic legal regimes.” Intelligence sharing 16ch NVR Recorder wireless ip camera arrangements arguably fail the test of lawfulness, says the report, because individuals are unable to foresee when they might be affected by surveillance at home or abroad. |
