MISC.
TO ZOOM PAGE: Hold Ctrl and press+/- or use Mouse wheel
---------------
YOU CAN COMMENT ANONYMOUSLY by clicking "Comments" under each post, and then, chose "anonimac" (anonymous). Write your comment, chose a nickname (Vaš nadimak), and send the comment (POŠALJI)
---------------
Who was Captain Nemo?
Scroll down the post.
---------------
Beautiful Melodious Music
Some changes in the forum's software made the videos in the posts from pp1-16 disappear. Just open the links visible in the posts in new tabs.

---------------
Great Craftsmanship and Industrial Design
---------------
Topic about substances that could inhibit the Coronavirus infection
---------------
Sunburns: how to treat and prevent
---------------
Dr Brad Stanfield YouTube Channel
---------------
Dr. Sten Ekberg YouTube Channel
---------------
Dr. Eric Berg DC YouTube Channel
---------------
KenDBerryMD YouTube Channel
---------------
motivationaldoc YouTube Channel
---------------
Istria is the world's best region for extra virgin olive oils, six years in a row (Well it had to be said ;-))
---------------
THE BEST ANSWER TO WHITE GUILT (Don't know if it is the "best", but definitely a usable one.)
---------------
JENNIFER MOLESKI - YouTube Channel
One of the best channels out there, particularly for women, and particularly for those tempted by feminism and who are not irretrievable yet.

----------------
YOUR WINGMAM (dating advice)
Although I do not agree with some things, like the apparent acceptance of casual dating as something normal (although she seems to have changed after some criticism from me, and even incorporated some of my comments in her videos), the channel is still very worth watching if one filters these aspects out.

---------------
TAYLOR THE FIEND
Channel about modern dating and relationships. Often caricatural and exterme, and oriented resolutely against marriage, which I disapprove, but there are also some very useful insights to be found, if one keeps thinking with one's own head.

----------------
MANOSPHERE
Channel about modern dating and relationships. Similar to "Taylor the Fiend", but sometimes with a different emphasis and some studies results. I actually didn't watch much of his videos, and learned about them recently on "Taylor the Fiend" as they seem to have a cooperation.


HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF THAT COOPERATION, and mostly a great video to watch, although I don't agree with some things, but despite that very much worth watching.
----------------
FAIL FOR YOU
Hilarious and instructive. Don't agree with everything, but gets seal of approval. (I must admit that I didn't check it for a long time.)

---------------
RED WOLF
Former Russian psychologist talks about female nature, psychology, dating, relationship. Unfortunately, he doesn't make videos anymore,but those he made are worth watching

---------------
All those YouTube channels make me cringe for various reasons, because they do not represent levels of humanity high enough, but still, as someone said, a wise man can learn something from everyone. Particularly if he uses his own critical thinking.
---------------
Casey Zander YouTube Channel
Video channel about building a masculine frame. I do not consider the masculinity paradigm presented here to be complete, but it's a start, although some things are quite simplistic and do not include a higher life wisdom about how a Man and a Woman must create life together. Masculine frame is one thing, but knowing what to do with it is complete masculinity. In the following links, more comments on Stormfront:
Comment 1
Comment 2
---------------
Alexander Grace YouTube Channel
Channel analyzing the relationship of the sexes, mostly through a perspective connecting biological evolution and the psychological dimension. While the author has recently more or less evolved from the advocacy of promiscuity to more fundamental values (still unclear), he is still stuck into reductive individualism and libertarianism, not understanding the importance of the collective and the need for a political transformation of culture. However, some very good psychological insights, but insights that have a "ceiling" in the spiritual height of that individual, which is not sufficient; too stuck in relativism. He is also too stuck inside animal models, not understanding that Humans are not animals, and have much higher potentials that must be activated. His ideas unfortunately don't help in that process of humanization and spiritualization. That little cunt even silent banned me for contradicting him and for offering better paradigms than his, but if you keep your critical mind, the channel is still worth watching.
















Captain's Blog

09.06.2022., četvrtak

What is Feminism?

There may be various definitions and waves of feminism, but the only really important thing about feminism, is its practical implications in life, how it makes feminist women behave in the present time and what are the consequences.

Feminism increases the ego of women, makes them entitled and demanding, focused on what they can get from men, and not what they can give or what they can be and create together.
Feminism convinced modern women that they are entitled to everything, that they deserve everything just by being women, and makes them believe that this sense of entitlement is what a woman is all about or should be.

Feminism also drives women away from their natural feminine nature into an artificial ideological identity.
That artificial ideological identity if focused on power and ego, and a number of ideological axioms or rules.

Women like that become woke ideological automatons instead of being women.

Except... whatever their ideology, their female nature remains (not "feminine", but "female", because "feminine" is the human nature, "female" the animal), and that creates a contradiction in those women vis a vis men.

Because they ideologically want leftie men, who are not real men but infantile versions (or liars who pretend to be leftie to get laid), but they still desire real Men, and that contradiction results in lots of failures and eventual bitterness, because feminism made them ideological automatons instead of women who are ready to build a common family life with a Man.
For such women a relationship with a man is not a natural human thing, but an ideological enterprise, an ideological mission where they have some ideological points to prove.
These women are afraid to love a man, because in their artificial reality, it would be a betrayal of feminism and of its "men are bad - men are oppressors" ideology.

And the fact that feminism in practice views men as the enemy, removes women even further from the idea of a harmonious quality life together, both sides must work for as a team.

It may also be that when they meet a real Man, to whose leadership a natural woman would naturally want to surrender, their artificial ideological identity automaton takes over, and they get frightened by such a Man because his very existence and her attraction to him contradicts her artificial ideological identity, and she feels threatened, because she identifies herself with that fake identity.

Not being a natural woman but an ideological automaton, she cannot do what is natural for a woman, but will always have a potentially conflictual relationship with any man, and loses her ability to surrender to him and to a higher common purpose.

One other practical consequence of feminism for society is that it made women lose a lot of their value for Men. Women are less and less perceived as worthy of a Man's love, care and protection. This loss of value is something I already mentioned in some previous posts.
Unfortunately, even high quality women suffer from that general loss of value, and may be treated as low value.

Because those "strong and independent" feminist women think that it is so empowering to live a promiscuous life and participate in hookup culture, and have all those "enriching, empowering" experiences, which actually feed their ego and destroy their natural soul and femininity, and then those women whine about men not caring about them and just using them for sex, perpetuating the myth of "men bad" because they just want to use women, when in fact those women destroyed their value for men, who then use them for what these women have themselves demonstrated they are only good for...
So "men bad" is a self fulfilling prophecy of sorts. Feminism creates the "evil" it supposedly fights against, because men will not respect sluts and the more women behave like sluts, the less respect they will get from Men.

Of course, as I said before,women cannot really be blamed, because men should have kept patriarchy and should have prevented feminism from happening. When there is no masculine leadership, women go the wrong path. Women only respect Men who lead and control, they will definitely not respect men who can be led and manipulated by women.
Women only respect Men they are too afraid to disrespect. So never put yourself in a subordinate position vis a vis a woman, and never try to get validation from her. Make her search for your validation instead.

On the other hand, this happened because the old forms of patriarchy were not adapted to new socioeconomic and technological conditions anymore, and it is imperative that men understand that a return to patriarchy implies its evolution to a higher level of maturity, responsibility and awareness - an aware masculinity in all its aspects of leadership and responsibility.

Neo-Patriarchy is NOT any kind of old Patriarchy based on superficial gender roles, it is something new and evolved into a fundamental understanding of the real natures and roles of Men and Women in their couple.

Neo-patriarchy is the only viable solution for both sexes. It gives the correct human frame for their relationship.

Aware masculinity is the key because men cannot continue to have" boyish love" for women (a notion I explained in a previous post) where they just instinctively and without awareness follow their masculine instinct to protect, give and provide, and then get burned by these modern feminist women, or they see other men get burned, which makes them either turn away from women, or become predators that use women for sex.
But none of these reactions is the solution, aware masculinity is, because it is a true aware taking charge of life instead of an immature "good boy" masculinity, that is not really taking full aware responsibility for leading life where it should go.
Aware masculinity is mature masculinity, the transition from a boy to a Man.

Aware masculinity will generate a new form of patriarchy, a neo-patriarchy, not relying on traditional social forms like before, but on the active awareness of Men.

And you know what... returning to the subject of feminism, what women really need, what their nature really needs in order to function, is a strong controlling hand; a benevolent loving, leading hand that gives and rewards, but a hand that can take all that away if necessary - the hand of patriarchy.

Continue reading...


ADDITION:

Left to itself and not existing inside the frame of true Masculinity, true Patriarchy as moral system, women's morality is a morality of the weak.
She wants to be protected, particularly from those strong frightening men, and the solution presented to her is the promotion of weakness in society and among men, emasculate them, and to also emasculate their male children teaching them the morality of the weak. The schizophrenia in that kicks when she realizes that she is actually only attracted by those strong frightening men...

The only solution, obviously, is Patriarchy, a morality of strength not weakness, and promoting strength and leadership among men, but also controlling that strength by strength, not by weakness.

Women also tend to be conformists. From their evolution they have the need to be validated as "good" by society. In the past by a patriarchal society of strength, i.e. by men, but since the cultural left has effectively taken over, and the left has also a feminine morality of the weak, they are now under the control of the left.
The only exceptions are women who have experienced the benefits of patriarchy in childhood through a strong, responsible benevolent Patriarch father, and understand the need for strong, responsible Patriarchal Men, who are really the only ones who can protect women and society from the chaos produced by a civilization of weakness, which has eliminated Patriarchs, but in which predators prosper because... we should be nice to them and put our collective head in the sand in the name of weakness ideology...

In a weak society, predators of all kinds thrive.

In a patriarchy women can be women and realize what it means to be a balanced woman, without having a split personality wanting to weaken and emasculate men, and at the same time desiring strong men.
Because of that contradiction women get attracted by the only strong men prospering in the society of the weak: the predators, but they cannot build a happy life with those, and they don't realize that they actually need strong Patriarchs creating a stable society and civilization of strength, controlled by the strength of stable, responsible and strong Patriarchal Men.
In such society, women become more and more unstable in their promiscuity with predators and destroy healthy society.

But I don't blame women, I blame men who bought this idea of a civilization of the weak, and that such model based on promoting weakness is good. The only way out is to reestablish a morality of strength controlled by responsible and wise strength.
Aware men must act, helped by aware women who understand that even for women, a society of strength controlled by strong benevolent Patriarchal men is the only really viable solution.

Of course, and again, not any form of primitive obsolete patriarchy, but an evolved Patriarchy in the sense that the control of strength by strength must be done in a much wiser, more aware form, where Patriarchy is combined with real structural and systemic knowledge of all dimensions of human life, individual and collective, male and female - a holistic knowledge guiding Patriarchy.

PS: And remember, Masculinity IS Patriarchy.
Maculinity is not about being able to get sluts into bed, it is about taking responsibility for oneself and society, which means NEVER accepting what is unacceptable and never making compromises with the unacceptable - that's what it means to be a MAN, otherwise you are just a wimp and a slug without backbone.

Men accepted women's slutting, something they should had never accepted, and should NEVER accept! If you accept it, you are not a MAN, no matter how many sluts you can get into bed.
You may just have maleness but not Masculinity. Masculinity has maleness as a component, but Masculinity is much more than mere maleness, it is being a Man, a real Man who takes uncompromising leadership and responsibility, not just an animal who is, make no mistake, NOT a Man.








- 08:49 - Comments (0) - Print - #

<< Arhiva >>

< lipanj, 2022 >
P U S Č P S N
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30