|
MISC.
TO ZOOM PAGE: Hold Ctrl and press +/- or use Mouse wheel
---------------
YOU CAN COMMENT ANONYMOUSLY by clicking " Comments" under each post, and then, chose " anonimac" (anonymous). Write your comment, chose a nickname ( Vaš nadimak), and send the comment ( POŠALJI)
---------------
Who was Captain Nemo?
Scroll down the post.
---------------
Beautiful Melodious Music
Some changes in the forum's software made the videos in the posts from pp1-16 disappear. Just open the links visible in the posts in new tabs.
---------------
Great Craftsmanship and Industrial Design
---------------
Topic about substances that could inhibit the Coronavirus infection
---------------
Sunburns: how to treat and prevent
---------------
Dr Brad Stanfield YouTube Channel
---------------
Dr. Sten Ekberg YouTube Channel
---------------
Dr. Eric Berg DC YouTube Channel
---------------
KenDBerryMD YouTube Channel
---------------
motivationaldoc YouTube Channel
---------------
Istria is the world's best region for extra virgin olive oils, six years in a row (Well it had to be said ;-))
---------------
THE BEST ANSWER TO WHITE GUILT (Don't know if it is the "best", but definitely a usable one.)
---------------
JENNIFER MOLESKI - YouTube Channel
One of the best channels out there, particularly for women, and particularly for those tempted by feminism and who are not irretrievable yet.
----------------
YOUR WINGMAM (dating advice)
Although I do not agree with some things, like the apparent acceptance of casual dating as something normal (although she seems to have changed after some criticism from me, and even incorporated some of my comments in her videos), the channel is still very worth watching if one filters these aspects out.
---------------
TAYLOR THE FIEND
Channel about modern dating and relationships. Often caricatural and exterme, and oriented resolutely against marriage, which I disapprove, but there are also some very useful insights to be found, if one keeps thinking with one's own head.
----------------
MANOSPHERE
Channel about modern dating and relationships. Similar to "Taylor the Fiend", but sometimes with a different emphasis and some studies results. I actually didn't watch much of his videos, and learned about them recently on "Taylor the Fiend" as they seem to have a cooperation.
HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF THAT COOPERATION, and mostly a great video to watch, although I don't agree with some things, but despite that very much worth watching.
----------------
FAIL FOR YOU
Hilarious and instructive. Don't agree with everything, but gets seal of approval. (I must admit that I didn't check it for a long time.)
---------------
RED WOLF
Former Russian psychologist talks about female nature, psychology, dating, relationship. Unfortunately, he doesn't make videos anymore,but those he made are worth watching
---------------
All those YouTube channels make me cringe for various reasons, because they do not represent levels of humanity high enough, but still, as someone said, a wise man can learn something from everyone. Particularly if he uses his own critical thinking.
---------------
Casey Zander YouTube Channel
Video channel about building a masculine frame. I do not consider the masculinity paradigm presented here to be complete, but it's a start, although some things are quite simplistic and do not include a higher life wisdom about how a Man and a Woman must create life together. Masculine frame is one thing, but knowing what to do with it is complete masculinity. In the following links, more comments on Stormfront:
Comment 1
Comment 2
---------------
Alexander Grace YouTube Channel
Channel analyzing the relationship of the sexes, mostly through a perspective connecting biological evolution and the psychological dimension. While the author has recently more or less evolved from the advocacy of promiscuity to more fundamental values (still unclear), he is still stuck into reductive individualism and libertarianism, not understanding the importance of the collective and the need for a political transformation of culture. However, some very good psychological insights, but insights that have a "ceiling" in the spiritual height of that individual, which is not sufficient; too stuck in relativism. He is also too stuck inside animal models, not understanding that Humans are not animals, and have much higher potentials that must be activated. His ideas unfortunately don't help in that process of humanization and spiritualization. That little cunt even silent banned me for contradicting him and for offering better paradigms than his, but if you keep your critical mind, the channel is still worth watching.
|
Captain's Blog
16.03.2021., utorak
The Meaning of Life
Link to the Same Topic on Stormfront
A Stormfront member asked:
"If God does not exist, then does this mean that life has no meaning?"
Here is what I replied:
OK, but even with a God, what would be life's meaning?
Would it be just the perpetuation of one's existence?
Would it be being "good"?
What meaning would one like life to have anyway? And what is meaning to you or me anyway?
Perhaps before trying to answer the question if life has a meaning, should we ask ourselves what "meaning" is for us, what is its structure in our psyche.
Is it something that is part of our structure as beings? To what is it connected? To external things?
Or is this connection an illusion, the illusion that our reactions are conditioned by the exterior?
Could it be that the external conditioning is like a parasitic wedge planted in a feedback process that has its own inner causality?
Could it be that our "meaning" is ourselves, not the images that we have of ourselves or our lives, but the very process of conscious life that we are, and that this process has its own causality that is not conditioned by anything exterior?
Could it be that your meaning is you in this instant, the inner life causality that you are now, independent of any external conditions?
If it was so, the "feeling" of meaning could be in fact the tendency of your system, of your true inner unconditioned causality, to complete itself, to integrate life IN ITSELF, not to be integrated into something exterior.
That would mean that a system would reach its full "meaning" when it realizes the full circle between the inner causality of the system and the external actions that are integrated as the act of creation of the free inner causality.
What I am saying is that what we call meaning "could" well be the very structure of life that we are, the full completion, not of something exterior, but of our own structure, of the inner causal life process that we are.
The idea is that it is not (exterior) life that gives us meaning. It is us who give meaning to life in its specific external forms, because the source of meaning is the very structure of life that we are.
Meaning is ourselves, when we realize our inner causality, the causality of the system that is us.
Meaning is the full circle of realization of that causality, the full implementation of the principle of the system. Then, what you get as feedback from the exterior is not something that conditions YOU, it is something that gets integrated in the logic of your inner causality, of the creative life process that you are, not something defining that process.
Meaning is the freedom that you are, as a Human.
The trick is to turn things around, or more exactly to turn them straight up again, as they are generally turned up side down in most people.
Meaning is a function of the system, a structural property of what humans are as systems.
Meaning is not a function of the external. It is the full integration of life's contents in the process of inner causality that we are. It is the full circle that starts from the inner causality and returns to it, never defining that causality trough the contents that this causality processes.
Meaning is life itself, as the fully realized system that we are.
Link to the Same Topic on Stormfront
|
|
|
| |
ožujak, 2021 |
> |
| P |
U |
S |
Č |
P |
S |
N |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
| 8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
| 15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
| 22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
| 29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
