brakecxe,spring brake chamber

Not satisfied with stand taken by the sessions court Ms Pillai moved the Bombay high court where the matter would be heard on August 22.After this, Ms Pillai also submitted her terms, to which lawyer appearing on behalf of Mr Paes said that he would show it to the Mr Paes when he returns to India. She had sought directions for not removing her from the house where she claims to be living with Mr Paes since the last few years. She had also sought maintenance from Mr Paes.The tennis player too had filed an application in the family court and questioned the ‘maintainability’ of Ms Pillai’s plea stating that the family court did not have jurisdiction to hear a case under Domestic Violence Act filed against him because they are not married.After hearing both the sides, however, the family court rejected plea made by Mr Paes following which he had moved the sessions court to challenge the family court’s decision.

The Bombay high court has asked tennis star Leander Paes and his estranged partner model Rhea Pillai to resolve their dispute amicably for the sake of their minor daughter. He told the court that the tennis player is out of the country for some tournaments.Ms Pillai had alleged Mr Paes and his father were harassing her and she had moved to the family court under sections of Domestic Violence Act..During hearing the judge observed efforts that were being taken by both the parties so she stressed on a logical end at least for the sake of their child.The sessions court had then said that before drawing any conclusions, it is necessary to hear the evidence of both the sides.Justice Revati Mohite-Dere on Wednesday asked the celebrity couple to think about future of their minor daughter and try to “try to come up with some kind of solution amicably.”On June 10, the high court judge had met with the couple in her chamber and had asked them to amicably resolve their issues. Following China slack adjuster this Mr Paes’s lawyer on Wednesday submitted his consent terms; however, Ms Pillai and her lawyer rejected them and said they were not acceptable

However, about 39 per cent manufacturing projects in Orissa remained under implementation as of September 2015.S.The manufacturing sector in the country attracted live investments worth about Rs 33 lakh crore, about one-fifth of total li-ve investments worth over Rs 164 lakh crore drawn by various sectors across India as of September 2015, the study said.Orissa has the maximum share of over 17 per cent in the total live investments worth about Rs 33 lakh crore attracted by manufacturing sector across the country, according to a study conducted by industry body Assocham.Gujarat was ranked second (nearly 12 per cent) followed by Karnataka (11 per cent), Jharkhand (nine per cent) and Chhattisgarh (seven per cent), said the study titled “Impact analysis of delay in investment implementation in manufacturing” by Assocham.“Metal and metal products alone accounted for almost half (48 per cent) of the total live investments attracted by manufacturing sector in India followed by chemicals and chemical products (24 per cent), machinery (8 per cent), transport equipment (7 per cent), construction material (7 per cent), food and agro based products (3 per cent),” it said.Delayed projects facing cost escalation have maximum share of 31 per cent in Orissa followed by Karnataka, Rajasthan and Jharkhand (9 per cent each), the study said. Rawat, secretary general of Assocham, while releasing the findings of the chamber’s study.Highlighting the impact of delay in implementation of projects in manufacturing sector across India, the Assocham study noted that out of 1,160 projects that are in different stages of implementation, 422 projects have reported time or cost overruns worth about Rs 9 lakh crore or 50 per cent of the actual investment.“Considering that long delays in projects’ implementation hurts investors’ sentiment, the government needs to have a strong plan to prioritise speeding up stuck projects’ effective implementation by creating a target-oriented roadmap,” said Mr D.“Even investors Truck Clutch Boosters should be penalised if projects get delayed due to improper planning, change of ownership, lack of finance, absence of co-ordination with contractors and other related issues,” said Mr Rawat.