čitajte glog!

tko upravlja čime

živčanim sistemom upravljaju hormoni,
a hormonima upravljaju endokrine žlijezde,
a endokrinim žlijezdama upravljaju čakre
a čakrama upravlja duševni razvoj individue
odnosno razina iznad -duhovni razvoj bića
odnosno svijest iliti Volja.

ovdje je očigledno da individualna Volja mora proći kroz filtere-
ovdje navedenih barem 6 (koliko ima čakri ispod 7.čakre koja je čista Volja)
preskakanje kojeg koraka može unakaziti individuu, jer se zanemaruje priroda, zakon harmonije.

čime vlada priroda?
čakrama ako se čovjek ne razvija.
odnosno ako se dešava da priroda mora upravljati onim čime bi Volja "odozgo" (odnosno ne odozgo nego iznutra ) trebala upravljati.

čime vlada svijest?
analogijama (u razvoju)

stupanj razvijenosti čovjeka je stupanj kojeg pokazuju otvorene čakre a među njima i najvažniji energetski centar -središnji-HARA.
ovo ne znači "rad na čakrama", nego čakre samo ukazuju na stupanj razvijenosti duše i otvorenosti duha. duha kao u djeteta, ono što "odrasli" najčešće nemaju.

i sad mi nedaju označiti sve kategorije na blogu

a tribute to katyusha

preboljevanje smrti

da bi čovjek mogao odagnati silu smrti, morao bi ostati u dubokom stanju povišene svijesti sve dok ne odbije od sebe smrt.

dr Grga

brkanje procesa i stanja

ljudi brkaju procese i stanja, kruške i jabuke po običaju.

nogomet je isključivo proces, dakle nije bitan, rivalstvo je isključivo proces, dakle nije bitno. brak je proces, dakle nije bitan, rat je proces, dakle nije bitan. mir je stanje, nije proces.

npr ljubav je stanje ali za ljude ona je i proces.
kako je gore tako je dole,
no proces nikada neće postati stanje.
nikada dole neće postati gore.
samo gornje se može preslikavati na doljnje,
doljnje se ne može preslikavati na gornje.
dvoje moraju biti u stanju ljubavi a ne samo u procesu.
dugotrajnim voljenjem neće se nikoga zavoljeti, ili hoće, ali to je iluzija.
samo daljnje udaljavanje od stanja.

"božansko" koje je zapravo unutarnje stanje individue, kojeg ljudi popularno vole nazivati "bog" kao da je neko vanjsko stanje, vanjski autoritet, oboje kako god zvučali su stanje.
oni nisu proces. no kako to da je za vjernike bog kao unutar "vjera u boga" proces? kako to da su toliko pogriješili?
za boga glupi ljudi kažu da je ljut, voli kažnjavati, voli nagrađivati, sebičan je, katkad zadovoljan a najčešće mu nije po volji, ali kako?
pa on bi trebao biti stanje a ne proces!

suština je također stanje, dok je ličnost-proces.
no ljude ne zanima njihova prava suština, njih zanimaju samo procesi, isključivo odnosi sa drugim ljudima, druge ličnosti.
ljude će rađe zanimati neki vanjski "bog" nego ono što su oni zaista, jer to bi moglo biti i ružno i presiromašno.
a tome bogu bi se željeli približiti po svaku cijenu i to pomoću procesa. jadna li je to gomila koja traži bogatstvo u svome siromaštvu.

dakle nečija suština je više nego bog, ona je "božansko" stanje unutar čovjeka, njoj čovjek treba da odgovara, a ne nekakvim bogovima vanjskim, procesima vanjskim.
ČOVJEK BI SAMO NE LICEMJERNO TREBAO BITI ONO ŠTO JE.
ovo je stanje, ne proces. procesi su samo ljude doveli u propast.
sve je ljudima proces, ništa nije stanje, ništa nije sada i ovdje, sve je malo kasnije, malo sutra!

dva prijatelja se posvađaše, i sada im je ugroženo prijateljstvo, ali kako je to moguće? pa prijatelji su valjda, ako su prijatelji, tada prijateljstvo nije bitno!
proces nije bitan ako je stanje tu!

priroda je proces, ali onaj koji ima svijest, onaj koji postoji, onaj koji ju promatra, taj je stanje. i taj jest više nego bilo koji vanjski bog.
on postoji.
neka ljudi ovo shvate ili neka crknu.
nijedno stanje to ne dira.

ein Reich :)

apop By Professor Jason Gildow

Apep was the Epyptian god of evil, an immense snake who nightly attempts to devour the sun, only to be defeated at dawn eternally, until the last dawn. The last dawn of the Egyptians is described in Plate Ten of the Papyri of Ani, the Egyptian Book of the Dead. This same plate of the Papyri contains a hymn to Apep, a curious anomoly when one considers that Apep is incarnate evil and hymns are reserved for the praise of kindly deities. The juxtaposition of the Egyptian Apocalypse with the only extant hymn to Apep is not coincidental. The two are commentaries upon each other, and they reveal the vestigial remains of a Snake-Sun cult that is older than the Egyptian Old Kingdom.


The hymn to Apep in Plate Ten of the Papyri of Ani describes Apep as having one head that is Horus and another that is Maat. After this assertion there follows the statement that Horus also has two heads, one that is Maat and another that is wickedness. Ani combines these two statements by explaining that Truth follows wickedness, and the workers of good and evil follow these Ideals in an endless cycle within the symbol of the two-headed god that is both Apep and Horus. The end of this hymn is the declaration that Horus is the god of the region and that Thoth is working in the name of Horus to defend the faithful from the growing armies of the "Slaughtering Knives" that represent the onslaught of the final dawn that Ani is prophecizing. The remainder of the narrative in Plate Ten details the conflict and conflagarations of the end times in which Osiris returns.


The symbol of the composite god that is both Apep and Horus and is beyond the dualistic conflicts of good and evil is a representation of the sun as a snake, an image of the brightness of the sun casting at tracer tail of its path through the sky like a slinking cosmic snake. The paths and courses of the sun, moon and stars were the basis of early Egyptian religion, and the symbol of the sun as a giant burning serpent blazing above the earth was most likely the most ancient of Egyptian worship.


This ancient cult of Apep was amalgamated with countless subsequent cults in Egypt that separated the entities of the sun and snake, and then further distinguished one as good and one as evil. The downward mythic displacement of Apep from a central creative deity to the incarnate evil of the pantheon eradicated the cult of Apep which had grown very ancient and had lost most of its political power. By the time of the Theban Age when Ani wrote his Papyri, Apep had become associated with the slaughterer of the sun. hut in homage to his literary antecedents Ani inserted a brief fragment of the Apep cult tradition by showing that the sun and snake are but two heads of one deity that is central to the pantheon.


The clerical Apep tradition in Egyptian is not readily seen beyond this section of Ani, but its influence in Greek mythology is quite profound. The name Apep translates as "destroyer," and the original Sun-Snake god must have been envisioned as a destroyer of his enemies, the precise phrase that is used in Plate Ten of the Papyri, but the meaning of his name was convoluted over time to indicate that he was a destroyer of goodness. The name of Apollo in Greek also translates as "destroyer," and another Greek name based on this same word is Apollyon, the destroyer from the pit in Revelation 9:11. These names are all the same, and the indicate different versions of the same basic character.-


Apollo is called a destroyer because he gained his powers of prophecy through the destruction of the ancient Python who ruled Delphi. In Greek mythology. Python is always cast as a non-intelligent monster, yet he is the ancient protector and god of the Pythoi, the oracles of Delphi, who eternally kept the title of "Pythoness."


Here is the remainder of the Egyptian Apep cult in ancient Greece where it was transplanted in a very early age, most likely at the time when Apep's cult was on the decline in Egypt. Apollo was a regional Greek deity who overcame and gained the mythic heritage of the ancient Eyptian Python, but he took on the form of the Python and even its name, because "Apollo" is a Greek translation of "Apep." As Ovid shows us in ^Metamorphoses, Apollo is also the Greek version of Horus, and this equation turns us back to Ani where he demonstrates that Horus and Apep are but two heads of the same Sun-Serpent.


The final two Greek incarnations of Apep are Apophis and Apollyon. Apophis is a terrible destroyer in the Olympian mythos, and Apollyon is the same character but in the Christian setting of the Revelation of St. John. These characters are a synthesis of Horus and Apep because they are more human than serpentine, but still they represent terrible destructive powers. The connection between Apollyon and the Armageddon is the same as Apep and the end times described in Plate Ten of the Papyri. The confusion between the serpent as the slayer of the sun and the serpent as the sun itself is an ancient dilemma, but all of these diverse threads of the same tradition originate from one primordial cult of the Sun-Serpent, by whatever name he was originally called.