din976ji

srijeda, 23.06.2021.

It is important that the government approaches

The victims of the hit-and-run accident involving actor Salman Khan have different views with one of them saying he was happy with the judgment, but wants compensation. I want something so I can settle their future. He paid for my treatment, but even after that I spent around Rs 50,000. The Maharashtra government must approach the Supreme Court. I will approach the police and tell them I saw him drive," he added. I have five children. I still feel the pain in my leg during winter."I can’t earn now." A rod had to be fitted in Mr Shaikh’s leg, due to which he can’t walk without limping. I saw him getting out of the driver’s seat."The procedural lapses have been used to deny justice." "He was sitting in there for 15 minutes.Mohammad Ayub (23), son of Aziz Abdul said, "I want the government to approach the Supreme Court. What is there to say Everyone knows how they get away!"On the contrary, another victim, whose leg was severely injured, said he wanted Salman to get acquitted, but wants "someone" to pay compensation.

It is important that the government approaches the SC. It’s a sad day for it. How will I get the compensation otherwise I saw him in the driver’s seat. Senior lawyer Abha Singh raised several queries after the judgment, asking a simple question, "If Salman (Khan) was not driving, then who was " Speaking to The Asian Age, Ms Singh said, "It has raised a question mark on the criminal justice system. Everyone knows everything. Another victim said Salman deserved to be punished and the government should approach the Supreme Court. The victim, Abdulla Shaikh, said, "It’s good they released him, even I wanted the same.Speaking to this newspaper over the phone, Mohammad Aziz Abdul (46), who is named as Mannu Khan in the case said, "I had fractured my leg. If the police did not do their duty in this case then why are they not being punished " questioned Ms Singh.The victims of the hit-and-run accident involving actor Salman Khan have different views with one of them saying he was happy with the judgment, but wants compensation. But I want something for me. If Salman was not driving, who was If driver Ashok was driving, then why no action against him Why was the Yellow zinc carbon steel thread rod chemical analysis report not taken into consideration " "Why was (former police guard of Salman) Ravindra Patil’s statement not considered Section 32 and 45 of the Evidence Act has not been paid heed to," she added.

Ovaj blog je ustupljen pod Creative Commons licencom Imenovanje-Dijeli pod istim uvjetima.

Dnevnik.hr
Gol.hr
Zadovoljna.hr
Novaplus.hr
NovaTV.hr
DomaTV.hr
Mojamini.tv