ip camera system
08.09.2014., ponedjeljak
surveillance camera security systems
|
Futurist and a director of engineering, Ray Kurzweil, has discussed at length the imminent Human Body 2.0, which will incorporate medical nanobots that that can deliver drugs to specific cells and also identify certain genetic markers by using fluorescent labeling. Once these nanobots have entered the body, Kurzweil indicates ip camera surveillance camera that they could then ip camera wireless ip camera connect our brains directly to Cloud computing systems. Most significantly, Kurzweil states: It will be an incremental process, one already well under way. Although version 2.0 is a grand project, ultimately resulting in the radical upgrading of all our physical and mental systems, we will implement it one benign step at a time…. The wireless microchip is one of those “benign” steps. To those who have not looked into the issue of microchipped humans, this might sound all well and good within the realm of medicine. However, if we have learned one thing about sci-tech, it always has a tendency to spread – especially in an age of ubiquitous surveillance amid “security threats” of every stripe. In typical fashion, the push is already beginning for implanted microchips that can’ t be lost, forgotten or stolen like cards can. And this new generation of chip will be powered by processes already at work inside the body, so there will be no need for batteries like internal devices now require. But they aren’t addressing the health risks that can come with implanted microchips from radiation and other things. Of 16ch NVR Recorder wireless ip camera course, the greatest risk comes to those who willingly accept the mark which a Beast system will require of all who live under it, whether that be in the form of chip or tattoo. It will pose 4ch NVR System a risk to more than physical health. Their very soul will be at stake, should they accept it as just another tech advance. By agreeing to that, they will voluntarily hand over God’s greatest gift, their free will. This implantable microchip is only a foretaste of what’s to come. Scientists are working on a way to rewire damaged brains. Under the auspices of DARPA, brain implants contain dozens of tiny microelectrodes which will monitor electrical activity of damaged human brains, “and provide precise stimuli to help minds compensate for what they’ve lost.” Approximately 2.2 million vets and active military personnel have requested help for a mental health disorder at one time or another. The research is currently in the testing phase, using animals. It is part of an array of DARPA projects all aimed at restoring, replacing or altering brain function and memory. Using new technology will allow scientists, “to interface with the brain using hundreds, if not thousands, of electrodes.” They note that surveillance camera security systems if these devices eventually were implanted in the brain they could discern how well therapies were working by recording the neural activity they will measure and record. While such technology can have useful, even laudable purposes for soldier who have suffered from injuries to the brain, the possible uses by a Beast government on the population at large are easy to imagine. In conjunction with DARPA, a driving force behind the research is Obama’s Brain Initiative, which we have discussed in previous posts, most recently with an article titled, “200+ UK Neuroscientists Reject Obama ’s Human Brain Project” network camera surveillance system under, Predictive Technology: A New Tool For The Thought Police.“A new survey shows most people are willing to share biometric surveillance system information with government agencies if it would in some way improve their travel experience. |
30.08.2014., subota
Government Communications Security Bureau
|
The Five Eyes alliance of States – comprised of the United States National Security Agency (NSA), the United Kingdom’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), Canada’s Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), the Australian Signals Directorate (ASD), and New Zealand’s Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) – is the continuation of an intelligence surveillance system wifi ip camera partnership formed in the aftermath of the Second World War. Today, the Five Eyes has infiltrated every aspect of modern global communications systems. The world has changed dramatically since the 1940s; then, private documents were stored in filing cabinets under lock and key, and months could pass without one having the need or luxury of making an international phone call. Now, private documents are stored in unknown data centers around the world, international communications are conducted daily, and our lives are lived – ideas exchanged, financial transactions conducted, intimate moments shared – online. 'Most powerful they've ever been' The drastic changes to how we use technology to communicate have not gone unnoticed by the Five Eyes alliance. A leaked NSA strategy document, shared amongst Five Eyes partners, exposes the clear interest that intelligence agencies have in collecting and analyzing signals intelligence (SIGINT) in the digital age: “Digital information created since 2006 grew tenfold, reaching 1.8 exabytes in 2011, a trend projected to continue; ubiquitous computing is fundamentally 16 channel nvrchanging how people interact as individuals become untethered from information sources and their communications tools; and the traces individuals leave when they interact security camera system with the global network will define the capacity to locate, characterize and understand entities.” Contrary to the complaints of the NSA and other Five Eyes agencies that they are ‘going dark’ and losing the visibility they once had, the Five Eyes intelligence agencies are in fact the most powerful they’ve ever been. Operating in the shadows and misleading the public, the agencies 4 channel nvr boast in secret how they “have adapted in innovative and creative surveillance system ways that have led some to describe the current day as ‘the golden age of SIGINT |
29.08.2014., petak
16channel dvr surveillance
|
That same friend freaked out when we published a FOIA document after a reader discovered the redacted words could be revealed with a copy and paste treatment. Don't do that, my friend urged. Those people don't mess around. I laughed. The NCUA isn't the State Department, I countered. Maybe not, he said, but they all collaborate more than you think. 16channel dvr Or maybe he's just paranoid. Back when I was covering the corporate 16 channel dvrmeltdown, I’d frequently hear the “click-click” sound portrayed in movies that indicate a tapped phone line. Was my phone tapped? Or was the connection in my aging neighborhood just poor? I tend to believe the latter. But then last year it was revealed that the Justice Department seized the phone records of Associated Press reporters. The security threat had to do with a story reporting a foiled airline bombing plot. CU Times doesn't cover terrorism. But if the NCUA needs to spend a million dollars on surveillance equipment to ensure public confidence in the financial system, who's to say we won't someday be considered worthy of investigation?Through the Aiding Privacy project, Privacy International is promoting the development of 4 channel dvr international standards around data protection in the humanitarian and development fields and working with relevant organisations to make this happen. A new contribution towards this goal, Protecting Beneficiary Privacy: Principles and operational standards for the secure use of personal data in cash and e-transfer programmes, was released last week by the Cash Learning Partnership (CaLP) and represents a welcome to addition to the sparse network 8 channel dvr cameralandscape of standards and guidelines to protect privacy and ensure data protection in humanitarian and development initiatives. |
28.08.2014., četvrtak
agencies are playing a dirty game
|
The agencies are playing a dirty game; not content with following the already permissive legal processes under which they operate, they’ve found ways to infiltrate all aspects of modern communications networks. Forcing companies to handover their customers’ data under secret orders, and secretly tapping fibre optic cables between the same companies’ data centers anyway. Accessing sensitive financial data through SWIFT, the world’s financial [URL=http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/dvrhvrsdi-dvr-recorder-c-38.html8 channel dvr[/URL] messaging system, spending years negotiating an international agreement to regulate access to the data through a democratic and accountable process, and then hacking the networks to get direct access. Threatening politicians with trumped up threats of impending cyber-war while operating intrusion operations that weaken the security of networks globally; sabotaging encryption standards and standards bodies thereby undermining the ability of internet users to secure information. Each of these actions have been justified in secret, on the basis of secret interpretations of law and classified agreements. By remaining in the shadows, our intelligence agencies – and the governments who control them – have removed our ability to challenge their actions and their impact upon our human rights. We cannot hold our governments accountable when their actions are obfuscated through secret deals and covert legal frameworks. Secret law has never been law, and we cannot allow our intelligence agencies to justify their activities on the basis of it. In direct violation 16channel dvr of their obligations We must move towards an understanding of global surveillance practices as fundamentally opposed to the rule of law and to the well-established international human right to privacy. In doing so, we must break down legal frameworks that obscure the activities of the intelligence agencies or that preference the citizens or residents of Five Eyes countries over the global internet population. These governments have carefully constructed legal frameworks that provide differing levels of protections for internal versus external communications, or those relating to nationals 4 channel dvr versus non-nationals, attempt to circumvent national constitutional or human rights protections governing interferences with the right to privacy of |
27.08.2014., srijeda
called in the surveillance community
|
What’s more, IPS provides an analytics tool designed specifically for Facebook, implying a definite focus on the analysis of the kinds of services surveillance security systems and websites that the GCHQ programme Squeaky Dolphin is using. Glimmerglass, a California company specialising in physical fibre optic taps, advertises its probes as a way to intercept massive amounts of information travelling to social networks. In a presentation entitled "Paradigm Shifts" it displayed its physical probes and management system as a source of real time interception for particular communication sources. By selecting particular sources, the system intercepts traffic related to the particular "Communications Source," be it Facebook, Google, or Twitter. It would also appear network camera to use IPS's Facebook analysis tool as an example of the mapping and reconstruction of a person's digital life that can be done using the traffic intercepted by Glimmerglass' tools. Interception vs. Open surveillance camera Source It is important to remember that these types of technologies, similar to Squeaky Dolphin, are not simply analysing publicly available information, or open-source intelligence (as it is called in the surveillance community). While the acquisition of information from publicly available sources is problematic, it is distinctly different from the practice of GCHQ in its Squeaky Dolphin programme, which focuses on the interception through network camera physically tapping cables as the data is travelling across them, or gaining access through a third-party database. The documents outlining Squeaky Dolphin come from 2010, before many social networks including Google and Facebook used https to encrypt user traffic across their sites. These latest revelations illuminate the serious need for all communications to be properly secured in order to protect users, including by implementing https. However, encryption is no silver bullet, as https only mitigates interception in transit and intelligence agencies are always seeking wifi ip camera ways to crack the latest security 8 channel dvr measures. But at the very least these tools can help to better protect users' privacy and reduce their risk of exposure to agencies that seem determined to record and analyse every facet of our lives. |
called in the surveillance community
|
What’s more, IPS provides an analytics tool designed specifically for Facebook, implying a definite focus on the analysis of the kinds of services surveillance security systems and websites that the GCHQ programme Squeaky Dolphin is using. Glimmerglass, a California company specialising in physical fibre optic taps, advertises its probes as a way to intercept massive amounts of information travelling to social networks. In a presentation entitled "Paradigm Shifts" it displayed its physical probes and management system as a source of real time interception for particular communication sources. By selecting particular sources, the system intercepts traffic related to the particular "Communications Source," be it Facebook, Google, or Twitter. It would also appear network camera to use IPS's Facebook analysis tool as an example of the mapping and reconstruction of a person's digital life that can be done using the traffic intercepted by Glimmerglass' tools. Interception vs. Open surveillance camera Source It is important to remember that these types of technologies, similar to Squeaky Dolphin, are not simply analysing publicly available information, or open-source intelligence (as it is called in the surveillance community). While the acquisition of information from publicly available sources is problematic, it is distinctly different from the practice of GCHQ in its Squeaky Dolphin programme, which focuses on the interception through network camera physically tapping cables as the data is travelling across them, or gaining access through a third-party database. The documents outlining Squeaky Dolphin come from 2010, before many social networks including Google and Facebook used https to encrypt user traffic across their sites. These latest revelations illuminate the serious need for all communications to be properly secured in order to protect users, including by implementing https. However, encryption is no silver bullet, as https only mitigates interception in transit and intelligence agencies are always seeking wifi ip camera ways to crack the latest security 8 channel dvr measures. But at the very least these tools can help to better protect users' privacy and reduce their risk of exposure to agencies that seem determined to record and analyse every facet of our lives. |
26.08.2014., utorak
surveillance network camera
|
Shortly after news broke about the Squeaky Dolphin program, surveillance network camera researcher Dr Ben Hayes drew ip camera attention to Wire-X's "Content-based Social Network Analysis" and its similarities to GCHQ's Squeaky Dolphin. Wire-X's brochure, which is subtitled "Facing Social Networks", grabs attention with its heading "Good guys, Bad guys...They are all socializing online." Named AQWIREX, the product "automatically intercept(s) and analyze(s) in real time the major social networks and extract all the relevant data including profile information, friends, feeds, and posts in order to provide a clear visualization of the entity and a mapping of all the target connections". The marketing material also says that the surveillance system can analyse emails, forums, and chats in real time, providing "real time packet analyse" and the ability to scale interception "from tactical to nationwide." Through our Surveillance Industry Index, we have identified a similar technique being sold by surveillance companies, such as Israel's surveillance camera Nice Systems and their Horizon Insight product. Nice's Horizon Insight "Intercepts, formats and stores billions of telephony and IP events per data at a rate of thousands of data records per second" and performs integration with "all legacy sources with newly acquired sources in telephony, IP and open source fields to perform 16channel dvr fusion of all intercepted data". The attempt to combine both the model of Open Source Intelligence gathering with mass surveillance and analysis of that material is illustrated in a diagram showing the pulling collation of disparate sources to form a stream of information able to be understood by an individual analyst or operator. Sophisticated filtering provided within interception platforms can also lead to the targeting of particular websites. Italy's IPS sell a network interception platform called GENESI which centralises monitoring of IP networks, performing "real-time interception of different security systems types of Internet Content and Services ( i.e. email messages, Web accesses, Chat sessions)". This capability is combined with content 8 channel dvr filtering that can focus on content in the protocol header such as URL, which can then allow focus on particular services such as Facebook and YouTube. http://www.ipcctvcamera.net/ |
protect and respect security systems
|
Asking for humanitarian actors to protect and respect security systems privacy rights must not be distorted as requiring inflexible and impossibly high standards that would derail development initiatives if put into practice. Privacy is not an absolute right and may be limited, but only where limitation is necessary, proportionate and in accordance with law. The crucial aspect is to actually undertake an analysis of the technology and its privacy implications and to do so in a thoughtful and considered manner. For example, if an intervention requires collecting personal data from those receiving aid, the first step should be to ask what information is necessary to collect, rather than just applying a standard approach to each programme. In some cases, this may mean additional work. But this work should be considered in light of the contribution upholding human rights and the rule of law make to development and to producing sustainable network camera outcomes. And in some cases, respecting privacy can also mean saving lives, as information falling into the wrong hands could spell tragedy. A new framing While there is an increasing recognition among development actors that more attention needs to be paid to privacy, it is not enough to merely ensure that a programme or initiative does not actively harm the right to privacy; instead, development surveillance camera actors should aim to promote rights, including the right to privacy, as an integral part of achieving sustainable development outcomes. Development is not just, or even mostly, about accelerating economic growth. The core of development is building capacity and infrastructure, advancing equality, and supporting democratic societies that protect, respect and fulfill human rights. The benefits of development and humanitarian assistance can be delivered without unnecessary and disproportionate limitations on the right to privacy. The challenge is to improve access to and understanding of technologies, ensure that policymakers and the laws they adopt respond to the challenges and possibilities of technology, and generate greater public debate to ensure that rights and freedoms are negotiated at a societal level. Technologies can be built to satisfy both development and privacy.Privacy International's partner organisation, Bytes for All, has filed a complaint against the Government, decrying the human rights security systems violations inherent in such extensive surveillance 16 channel nvr and demonstrating how the UK's mass surveillance operations and its policies have a disproportionate impact on those who live outside the country. |
UK Surveillance 16 channel nvr
|
Bytes for All, a Pakistan-based human rights organization, filed its complaint in the UK Investigatory surveillance system Powers Tribunal (IPT), the same venue in which Privacy International lodged a similar complaint last July. While such mass surveillance ip camera, in and of itself, is violative of human rights, that infringement is compounded where foreigners' phone calls, emails, or internet searches are intercepted as they currently receive even fewer legal protections than the communications of those who reside in the UK. In addition to violating Articles 8 and 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), which protect private communications, such disparate treatment is a violation of Article 14 that prohibits discrimination of all sorts, including based on nationality. The Importance of Foreign Challenges to UK Surveillance 16 channel nvr Foreign people and organisations, like Bytes for All, whose human rights have been violated can and should challenge these discriminatory regimes within the countries that engage in such surveillance. As both Bytes for All and Privacy International argue, when it comes to the interception of communications, the violation of rights occurs where the interception takes place. Accordingly, every country owes the same obligation to each individual whose communications pass through their territory: not to interfere with those communications, subject to permissible limitations established by law. People who have had their communications intercepted, no matter their location or nationality, should be able to object to that interference in the courts and tribunals of the country that carried out the interception. By doing so, these foreign complainants can not only vindicate their privacy and expressive rights, they can also highlight the discrimination inherent in surveillance programmes like the UK's. Such discrimination is often overlooked, yet the interception of foreign communications by the UK is not rare. In fact, via its Tempora mass surveillance surveillance camera program, the UK reportedly gobbles up the vast majority of internet and phone traffic that travels through undersea fibre optic cables that land in the UK. |
25.08.2014., ponedjeljak
challenge security systems fairness
|
providing an opportunity for a hearing to challenge security systems fairness of the predictive process; and the establishment of an impartial surveillancee system adjudicator and judicial review to ensure accountability of those who adjudicate others, i.e. those who deprive individuals of a liberty interest do so without unwarranted bias or a direct financial interest in the outcome. The use of big data is intrinsically linked to ethical values, which means that the starting point must be the development international guidelines governing access to and analysis of individuals’ data. Thus as Crawford and Schultz conclude:The latest Snowden document revelation, which shows how GCHQ and the NSA are conducting broad, real-time monitoring of YouTube, Facebook, and Blogger using a program called "Squeaky Dolphin," is the most recent demonstration of the immense interception capabilities of intelligence services. Despite the program's cute name, "Squeaky Dolphin" is shocking in its ability to intercept raw data, which includes sensitive personal and location information, and keep tabs on people across the world who are simply security systems uploading videos or 'liking' the links on their friends' Facebook walls. Such massive, unrestrained capabilities are no way consistent with international law, as their capabilities and execution are clearly neither necessary nor proportionate. Because of this, Privacy International has litigation 16 channel dvr underfoot to challenge the legality of GCHQ's surveillance activities on the grounds that they fly in the face of the UK's human rights obligations. Operations like Squeaky Dolphin are yet another manifestation of GCHQ's disregard for privacy rights, and starkly illustrate the problem of secret, unaccountable intelligence gathering. Frighteningly, the capabilities demonstrated by Squeaky Dolphin - the combination of tapping IP networks and the construction of that with sources such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and other services - are not the exclusive preserve of the NSA and GCHQ. Privacy International's Surveillance Industry Index shows that surveillance network camera companies are marketing and selling these services right off the shelf, giving willing governments anywhere the ability to intercept huge amounts of raw data, monitor 8 channel dvr social networks in real time, and analyse the information obtained to create profiles on specific individuals and targets. |
